Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4909 MP
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
WP No. 25519 of 2022
(M/S BABHAV LAXMI BANDHI VIKASKHAND MAJHAGAWAN Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND
OTHERS)
Dated : 27-03-2023
Shri Shailendra K. Dwivedi, petitioner appears in person.
Shri K.S.Baghel, learned GA for respondent-State.
Petitioner appears in person and makes a prayer for adjournment of case and continuation of interim relief granted in favour of petitioner on 16.11.2022. Petitioner submits that advocate is not appearing in case due to strike. Petitioner
submits that he does not want to discharge the advocate in the case and advocate will argue the case.
Considering the prayer, case is adjourned. Division Bench of this Court has taken suo motu cognizance of communication made by Chairman of State Bar Council of M.P asking entire Lawyer community in State of M.P. to abstain from Court work. In PIL vide order dated 24.3.2023 passed in W.P.No.7295/2023 in para-18 following directions were issued:
"18. Under these circumstances, since the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been violated and keeping in mind the interest of the poor litigants, we deem it just and necessary to issue the following directions:-
(i) All the advocates throughout the State of Madhya Pradesh are hereby directed to attend to their court work forthwith.
They shall represent their clients in the respective cases before the
Signature Not Verified Signed by: NEETI TIWARI Signing time: 3/28/2023 3:14:48 PM
respective courts forthwith;
(ii) If any lawyer deliberately avoids to attend the court, it shall be presumed that there is disobedience of this order and he will be faced with serious consequences including initiation of proceedings for contempt of court under the Contempt of Courts Act;
(iii) If any lawyer prevents any other lawyer from attending the court work, the same would be considered as disobedience of these directions and he will be faced with serious consequences including initiation of proceedings under the Contempt of Courts
Act;
(iv) Each of the judicial officers are directed to submit a report as to which lawyer has deliberately abstained from attending the court;
(v) The judicial officers shall also mention the names of advocates who have prevented other advocates from entering the court premises or from conducting their cases in the court;
(vi) Such advocates shall be dealt with seriously which may even include proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act as well as being debarred from practice.
Division Bench had issued directions to Advocates to attend the Court work forthwith and to represent their clients in their respective cases. If abstention from work is deliberate then Advocate will have to face serious consequences including initiation of contempt petition.
In view of same, as Advocates for the parties are not appearing in the Signature Not Verified Signed by: NEETI TIWARI Signing time: 3/28/2023 3:14:48 PM
case, Registry is directed to issue show cause notice to counsel for the petitioner(s), whose name appear in the Vakalatnama to give explanation why Contempt Proceedings may not be initiated against him/her/them for deliberate violation of order dated 24.3.2023 passed in W.P No.7295/2023.
Notices shall not be issued to Government Advocates appearing for State since they remained present in Court and complied with directions passed in WP No.7295/2023.
List the matter after four weeks.
Interim order dated 16.11.2022 shall continue to remain in operation till next date.
(VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE
nd
Signature Not Verified Signed by: NEETI TIWARI Signing time: 3/28/2023 3:14:48 PM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!