Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.P.Rajya Sahakari Upbhokta ... vs Secretary The State Of Madhya ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 4329 MP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4329 MP
Judgement Date : 20 March, 2023

Madhya Pradesh High Court
M.P.Rajya Sahakari Upbhokta ... vs Secretary The State Of Madhya ... on 20 March, 2023
Author: Vivek Agarwal
                                                                       1
                         (
                                        IN    THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                            AT JABALPUR
                                                                  BEFORE
                                                    HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL
                                                           ON THE 20 th OF MARCH, 2023
                                                         WRIT PETITION No. 13432 of 2009

                                       BETWEEN:-
                                       M.P.RAJYA SAHAKARI UPBHOKTA SANGH MARYADIT
                                       KARMACHARI SANGH BHOPAL TH.ITS CHAIRMAN
                                       ABDUL LATIF KHAN R/O HOU.NO.40, AHAHTA RUSTAM
                                       KHAN, NEAR POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, BHOPAL
                                       (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                                  .....PETITIONER
                                       (BY SHRI K.C. GHILDIYAL - SENIOR ADVOCATE ASSISTED BY SHRI
                                       AJEET SINGH - ADVOCATE)

                                       AND
                                       1.    SECRETARY THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                             COOPERATIVE DEPTT., VALLABH BHAWAN
                                             (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                       2.    R E G I S T R A R COOPERATIVE        SOCIETIES
                                             VINDHYACHAL BHAWAN BHOPAL            (MADHYA
                                             PRADESH)

                                       3.    MANAGING DIRECTOR M.P. RAJYA SAHKARI
                                             UPBHOKTA SANGH PRIYADARSHNI BHAWAN T.T.
                                             NAGAR BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                       4.    BOARD      OF   DIRECTOR     OCCUPATION:
                                             PRAIYADARSHNI SUBIDHA SWA SEVA KENDRA
                                             T.T. NAGAR BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                               .....RESPONDENTS
                                       (BY SHRI MANAS MANI VERMA - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR THE
                                       STATE)
                                       (SHIR ASHISH SHROTI - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS NO.3 AND 4)
Signature Not Verified

                                             This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
  SAN




Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN
Date: 2023.03.23 16:54:59 IST
                                       following:
                                                                            2
                                                                               ORDER

This writ petition is filed by the M.P. Rajya Sahakari Upbhokta Sangh Maryadit Karmchari Sangh, Bhopal being aggrieved of the action of the respondents No.3 and 4 in reducing the rate of overtime from double the wages as prescribed in Section 55 of the M.P. Shops and Establishment Act, 1958 to single rate. This decision of the Authorities which was to come into force w.e.f. 01.10.2001 is under challenge before this Court.

Shri Ashish Shroti has raised an objection as to the maintainability of the writ petition saying that the respondent is a Federation of Cooperative Societies. Reading from the bye-laws contained in Annexure P-13, it is submitted that it is

not an instrumentality of the State and, therefore, it will not fall within the purview of Article 12 of the Constitution to be treated as a State.

It is further submitted that the decision of the Board of Directors was inconsonance of the financial condition of the respondents, therefore, no indulgence is required in the matter.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, it is evident that Government has stake of Rs.309.09 Lacs in the capital of the M.P. Rajya Sahakari Upbhokta Sangh Maryadit Karmchari Sangh, Bhopal. This is out of total paid up capital of 353.45 which constitutes 87.44% of the share capital. Thus, first argument put forth by Shri Ashish Shroti that respondent is not amenable to writ jurisdiction is not made out in the light of the judgment of Supreme Court in Madhya Pradesh Cooperative Dairy Federation Limited and Another Vs. Rajnesh Kumar Jamindar and Others, (2009) 15 SCC 221 wherein Supreme Court has held that M.P. State Signature Not Verified

Cooperative Dairy Federation Ltd. is covered by the definition. It is held that SAN

Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN Date: 2023.03.23 16:54:59 IST since the federation not only carries on commercial activities, it works for

achieving the better economic development of a section of the people. It seeks to achieve the principles laid down in Article 47 of the Constitution of India namely nutritional value and health. It undertakes training and research work. Guidelines issued by it are binding on the societies. It monitors the functioning of the societies under it. It is an apex body. It must, therefore, be held that the appellant would come within the purview of the definition of "State" as contained in Article 12 of the Constitution of India.

In the present case, the aims and objectives of the M.P. Rajya Sahakari Upbhokta Sangh Maryadit, Bhopal are as under-:

^^ 4- mn~ns';% v- lgdkjh fl)karks dk ikyu djrs gq;s izns'k esa fLFkr lEc) lgdkjh Fkksd miHkksDrk Hk.Mkjksa ,oa lkoZtfud forj.k iz.kkyh ds vUrxZr lkekU; ,oa vfrfjDr miHkksDrk oLrqvksa ds dz;&fodz; ,oa forj.k esa layXu lgdkjh lfefr;ksa ds dkjksckjksa dks lefUor djuk] mudks lqfo/kk,a iznku djuk muds O;kikj dks c<+kok nsuk ,oa jkT; esa lgdkjh miHkksDrk vkUnksyu dks lqn`<+ djuk rFkk fo'ks"k :i ls uxjh; {ks=ksa esa vk/kqfud i)fr ds lqfo/kk Lolsok dsUnz LFkkfir djukA

4 v (1) ^^jkT;@dsUnz 'kklu ds fofHkUUk foHkkxksa[email protected];kZy;ks] fuxeksa] e.Myks] lgdkjh laLFkkvksa ds mi;ksx gsrq rFkk mDr ds }kjk lapkfyr fofHkUu ;[email protected];kstukvksa ds mi;ksx ds fy;s vko';d dk;kZy;hu rFkk vU; mi;ksxh lkexzh dk iznk; djukA c- mDr mn~ns';ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq,% 1- lEc) lfefr;ksa ds fy;s eky dh ekax iwfrZ djuk] miHkksDrk ,oa vU; oLrqvksa dk Fkksd

dz; ,oa fodz; djuk] vko';drkuqlkj LVkd djuk] iSdsftax xzsfMax ,oa ifjogu dh O;oLFkk djukA 2- miHkksDrk oLrqvksa dk vU; jkT; vFkok fons'kksa ls vk;kr ,oa fu;kZr djuk vkSj bl gsrq jkT; 'kklu ds ,tsUV ds :i esa dk;Z djuk ,oa mlds forj.k dh leqfpr O;oLFkk djukA Signature Not Verified SAN

3- miHkksDrk oLrqvksa ds mRiknu gsrq Lo;a vFkok vU; lEc) lfefr;ksa ds lkFk ;k vU; Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN Date: 2023.03.23 16:54:59 IST

bPNqd lgdkjh lfefr;ksa ds lkFk feydj mRiknu bdkbZ;k LFkkfir djuk fdlh miHkksDrk m|ksx

dks yht ij ysuk mls pykus dh O;oLFkk djuk ,oa mRikfnr eky ds forj.k fodz; dh O;oLFkk djukA 4- miHkksDrk oLrqvksa ds [kqnjk fodz; ds fy;s jkT; esa vFkok jkT; ds ckgj fofHkUu LFkkuksa

esa la?k dh 'kk[kk,a] Lolsok fcdzh dsUnz ek¡My fjVsy lsy fMiks) fMikVZesaVy LVkslZ vkn'kZ i)fr ls [kksyuk lEc) lfefr;ksa dks [kqnjk fodz; dsUnz LFkkfir djus esa lg;ksx nsuk rFkk lgdkjh cktkj dh LFkkiuk djuk ;k djus esa lg;ksx nsukA 5- fHkUu&fHkUu iznZ'kfu;ksa ,oa fMekWLVªs'ku ds ek/;e ls [kk| vifeJ.k ds fo:) tuer tkxzr djuk ,oa bl gsrq lEc) lfefr;ksa vFkok vU; lgdkjh laLFkkvksa dks ekxZn'kZu nsuk ,oa lg;ksx nsukA 6- lEc) laLFkkvksa ds deZpkfj;ksa ds dsMj fuekZ.k gsrq vko';d igy djuk rFkk muds izf'k{k.k dh mfpr O;OkLFkk djukA

7- lEc) miHkksDrk Hk.Mkjksa ,oa vU; laLFkkvksa dh ys[kk i)fr ,oa Lda/k fu;a=.k (LVkd

dUVªksy) i)fr ds ekudhdj.k (LVs.MMkabZts'ku) esa lg;ksx nsuk] ekxZn'kZu nsuk rFkk muds dk;ksZ ds mfpr i;Zos{k.k dh O;oLFkk djukA 8- jkT; esa lgdkjh miHkksDrk vkUnksyu dh izxfr ,oa fodkl gsrq lEesyu v/;;u] xksf"B;ksa dk vk;kstu djuk rFkk miHkksDrkvksa ds ykHkkFkZ izpkj&izlkj ,oa f'k{k.k dk;Z djukA 9- ^^cktkj izkfo.;** ;k ekdsZV baVsyhtsal laca/kh vU; tkudkfj;k¡ ,df=r djuk ,oa mUgsa lnL; laLFkkvksa esa forfjr djukA 10- lEc) lfefr;ksa dk deZpkjh Hkfo"; fuf/k deZpkjh chek ;kstuk] vk;dj] fodz;dj vkfn lHkh izdkj ds djkjksi.k ,oa vU; oS/kkfud izfdz;kvksa ls ,oa vk/kqfud O;kikfjd ,oa ys[kk

i)fr;ksa ls voxr djkus ds fy;s rRlaca/kh uhfr funsZ'k izlkfjr djus ds fy;s la?k esa d{k (Lis'ky

lsy) dh LFkkiuk djuk vkSj ekxZn'kZu nsukA 11- la?k ,oa 'kk[kkvksa o fcdzh dsUnzksa ds O;olk; dks l{ke :i ls laikfnr djus ds mn~ns'; Signature Not Verified SAN ls vkUrfjd vads{k.k O;oLFkk gsrq fo'ks"k d{k dh LFkkiuk djukA Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN Date: 2023.03.23 16:54:59 IST 12- vU; ,sls leLr dk;Z djuk ftuls jkT; ds lgdkjh miHkksDrk vkUnksyu dks cy

feysA 13- lnL; lkslk;Vh ,oa vko';d lkexzh iznk; laca/kh miHkksDrkvksa ds fgr esa dksbZ Hkh vU; lsok iznku djukA 14- ,sls vU; lHkh O;olk; rFkk dk;Z djuk tks le; ij la?k ds fgr esa vko';d gksA 15- thou chek rFkk lkekU; chek dk dk;Z djus okyh laLFkkvksa dh ,tsalh izkIr dj chek laca/kh dk;Z djukA 16- 'kkldh;] v/kZ 'kkldh; ,oa vU; dk;kZy;ksa vkfn gsrq fizafVax vkfn dk;Z djukA

17- 'kklu ds fu;ekuqlkj nok(esfMflu) vkfn dk O;kikj djukA**

When these objects are read then they are inconsonance with provisions contained in Article 39(b) of the Constitution of India which deals with the distribution of ownership and control of the material resources of the community to be so distributed as to best subserve the common good. Article 43(a) deals with participation of workers in management of industries. Article 43(b) deals with promotion of cooperative societies. Thus, it is evident that respondents are discharging their consititional duty and not only promoting distribution of essential commodities and other commodities amongst the beneficiaries on an equal footing but are also responsible for promoting participation of workers in the management of the societies and also promotion of the cooperative societies.

Thus, in the light of the aforesaid judgment of Supreme Court and also the judgment of Constitution Bench of this Court in M.P. State Cooperative Dairy Federation Vs. Madan Lal Chourasia, 2007(2) MPLJ 594, I have no hesitation to hold that respondents' society is discharging the functions akin Signature Not Verified SAN

to that of State beside discharging Constitutional functions as enumerated Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN Date: 2023.03.23 16:54:59 IST

above and is a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution.

This leads to another question that whether respondent authorities are free to take any decision dehors the Rules and Regulations or are bound by the Rules and Regulations.

Shri Ashish Shroti is at loss to show any provision of law under which impugned decision was taken to reduce the rate of overtime. On the contrary, Shri K.C. Ghildiyal has shown Section 55 of the M.P. Shops and Establishment Act, 1958 whcih provides for rate on which over time is to be paid and reads as under:-

"55. Wages for overtime work.- Where an employee in any establishment is required to work in excess of the limit of hours of work, he shall be entitled, in respect of the overtime work, to wages at the rate of twice is ordinary rate of wages."

In the present case, it is not the stand of the respondents that provisions of M.P. Shops and Establishment Act, 1958 are not applicable.

On the contrary Shri Ashish Shroti submits that he had not seen this

provision. However, when he is requested to show from record that under which provision impugned action was taken, he is unable to demonstrate any legal provision under which said impugned action was taken by the respondents, therefore, in absence of any provision being brought on record to justify the action of the respondents No.3 and 4, that deserves to be set aside because an instrumentality of the State cannot act in an arbitrary and illegal manner and is suppose to loathe every decision of its with reasoning and transparency.

In absence of reasoning and transparency backed by the legal or Signature Not Verified SAN

statutory sanction, said decision is set aside and petition is allowed. It is Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN Date: 2023.03.23 16:54:59 IST

directed that petitioner will be entitled to overtime in terms of the provisions

contained in Section 55 of the M.P. Shops and Establishment Act, 1958.

In above terms, this petition is allowed and disposed of. Certified copy as per rules.

(VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE Tabish

Signature Not Verified SAN

Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN Date: 2023.03.23 16:54:59 IST

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter