Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gautam And Ors. vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2023 Latest Caselaw 3690 MP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3690 MP
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2023

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Gautam And Ors. vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 March, 2023
Author: Rajendra Kumar (Verma)
                                                                        1
                                        IN    THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                            AT JABALPUR
                                                                BEFORE
                                             HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)
                                                            ON THE 2 nd OF MARCH, 2023
                                                        CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2850 of 2000

                                       BETWEEN:-
                                       1.    GAUTAM S/O PYARELAL DHIMAR, AGED ABOUT
                                             35 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DEPARTMENT OF
                                             WEIGHTS & MEASURES, R/O RETATEK BARGI
                                             DAM REHABILITATION FISHERY COOPERATIVE
                                             SOCIETY, TIKARIYA, DISTRICT-MANDLA (M.P.)

                                       2.    ANUP SINGH S/O PYARELAL DHIMAR, AGED
                                             ABOUT 27 YEARS, CASTE DHIMAR, OCCUPATION
                                             LABROURER,       R/O VILLAGE PADMI, P.S.
                                             TIKARIYA DISTRICT-MANDLA (M.P.)

                                       3.    MUKESH KUMAR S/O PYARELAL BURMAN, AGED
                                             ABOUT 25 YEARS,
                                             CASTE DHIMAR, OCCUPATION LABOURER R/O
                                             TIKARIYA, DISTRICT-MANDLA (M.P.)

                                                                                                   .....APPELLANT
                                       (BY SHRI SHIVAM SINGH - ADVOCATE )

                                       AND
                                       THE  STATE      OF    MADHYA         PRADESH (MADHYA
                                       PRADESH)

                                                                                                 .....RESPONDENT
                                       (BY SHRI DINESH          PATEL       -   PANEL   LAWYER    FOR    THE
                                       RESPONDENT/STATE )

                                             This appeal coming on for final hearing this day, the court passed the
                                       following:
                                                                        ORDER

Signature Not Verified This criminal appeal is preferred under section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C. by SAN

Digitally signed by VAISHALI AGRAWAL the appellant being aggrieved by the judgment dated 29.11.2000 passed by Date: 2023.03.03 18:50:22 IST

the Special Judge, SC/ST Atrocities, Mandla in Special Sessions Case No.134/2000, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 323 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for three months and under Section 341 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for one month.

2. The case of the prosecution is that, on at about 7:00 p.m. when Barelal

was returning from the shop, at that time, due to previous amenity, accused persons came there and assaulted him by means of lathis. Thereafter, they threatened him and also abused him belonging to his caste.

3. After due appreciation evidence acquitted from charges and conviction and

sentence as mentioned in paragraph 40 of its judgement.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of appellant submits that he is not

challenging the finding of conviction recorded by the trial court and his only prayer is that the appellants have already suffered the jail 10 days and is in jail. It is further submitted that appellants does not want to press this appeal on the point of conviction, however, he requested to reduce the sentence which has already undergone by the appellants, looking to the fact and circumstances of the case. Thus, the ends of justice would be met if the jail sentence of the appellants is reduced to the period already undergone by them with fine.

5. Learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State has justified and supported the conviction and sentence passed by trial Court.

Signature Not Verified

6. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the SAN

Digitally signed by VAISHALI AGRAWAL material available on record along with the impugned judgment. On perusal Date: 2023.03.03 18:50:22 IST

of record, it seems that the appellants have been facing criminal

proceedings since last 23 years. Considering the nature of offence and other circumstances, as well as in the interest of justice, it would be appropriate to reduce the period of jail sentence awarded to the appellants to the period already undergone by them, subject to imposed of fine amount.

7. On perusal of record it reveals that appellants are facing criminal

proceedings since last 23 years. Appellants have suffered the jail sentence of about 9 days. It is pertinent to note that this appeal is of the year 2000 and after about 23 years it would be appropriate to reduce the jail sentence of the appellants for the period already undergone by them by imposing a fine amount of Rs.1,000/- under Section 323 and by imposing a fine amount of Rs.500/- under Section 341 which shall be paid to the complainant as compensation.

8. Appellants are in jail. They be released immediately from custody if they are not required in any other case subject to depositing of fine amount, failing which they have to suffer the entire jail sentence awarded by the trial Court.

9. Let a copy of this judgment be sent to the learned trial Court along with the record for information and necessary action.

10. Appeal is finally disposed off.

Certified copy as per rules.

Signature Not Verified SAN (RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)) Digitally signed by VAISHALI AGRAWAL JUDGE Date: 2023.03.03 18:50:22 IST vai

Signature Not Verified SAN

Digitally signed by VAISHALI AGRAWAL Date: 2023.03.03 18:50:22 IST

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter