Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9200 MP
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
CRA No. 5198 of 2023
(JASPAL YADAV Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
Dated : 20-06-2023
Shri Ajay Gupta, Senior Advocate with Shri Rajeev Mishra Advocate
for the appellant.
Shri Aditya Narayan Gupta-Government Advocate for the
respondent/State.
Parties are heard on I.A. No. 8057/2023, an application under Sections
389(1) of the Cr.P.C. for suspension of remaining jail sentence and grant of bail to appellant-Jaspal Yadav arising out of judgment dated 25.03.2023 delivered in S.T. No.100097/2011 by learned Additional Sessions Judge Naungaon, Distt. Chhatarpur.
T he appellant has been convicted under Section 302/149 of IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment with fine of Rs.2000/- and Section 147 of IPC and sentenced to undergo 1 year RI with fine of Rs. 500/- with default stipulations.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that as per prosecution story
the only role attributed to the appellant is that he exhorted co-accused Prakash to kill the deceased and it is co-accused Prakash, who had fired from katta and killed the deceased. No active role is attributed to the appellant. He was just traveling with the co-accused Prakash in the car at the time of incident. Learned counsel for the appellant has also submitted that co-accused Jitendra and Mahendra have been released on bail vide order dated 27.08.2013 passed in Cr.A. No.1732/2013 and case of the present appellant is similar to the case of the co-accused Jitendra and Mahendra. Therefore, present appellant is also
entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity.
Learned counsel for the State, while vehemently opposing the prayer of appellant, has submitted that learned Court below has rightly convicted the appellant. Hence, he prays for dismissal of the bail application.
Perusal of record of the case reveals that the role attributed to the present appellant and evidence available against him is similar to that of co- accused Jitndra and Mahendra, who have been released on bail vide order dated 27.08.2013. Therefore, maintaining the parity with the case of co-accused persons, appellant is also entitled to be released on bail. In view of above, we deem it proper to suspend the remaining jail sentence of the appellant.
Accordingly, I.A No. 8057/2023 is allowed.
Subject to depositing the fine amount, if not already deposited, the remaining jail sentence of the appellant- Jaspal Yadav is hereby suspended and it is directed that the appellant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court with a further direction to appear before the concerning trial court Chhatarpur on 11.09.2023 and also on such other dates, as may be fixed by the trial court in this regard during the pendency of this appeal.
C. c. as per rules.
(SUJOY PAUL) (ACHAL KUMAR PALIWAL)
JUDGE JUDGE
kundan
Digitally signed by
KUNDAN SHARMA
Date: 2023.06.22 13:24:40
+05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!