Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 783 MP
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
ITA No. 206 of 2022
(INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT Vs SUYASH EXIM PRIVATE LIMITED)
Dated : 12-01-2023
Ms Veena Mandlik, learned counsel for the appellant.
Heard on I.A. No. 8475/2022, an application u/S 5 of Limitation Act
for condonation of delay.
Fo r the reasons stated in the application, I.A. No. 8475/2022 is
hereby allowed. Delay of 80 days in filing this appeal is condoned.
Also heard on the question of admission.
Appeal is admitted for hearing on the following substantial questions
of law:
1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,
the ITAT was justified in law in holding that the re-assessment
proceedings are bad in law as the same were based on the Report
from the DDIT (Inv)3(1), Kolkata, without appreciating the
dictum of law pronounced in Multi Commodity Exchange of India
Ltd. Vs. DCIT dt. 14.12.2018(SC) wherein the re-assessment
notice, on the basis of special audit report after completion of
original assessment, was held justified ?
2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,
the ITAT was justified in law in placing reliance on GKN Drive
Shafts (India) Ltd. Vs. ITO(SC) without appreciating that the
impugned re-assessment proceedings import their legitimacy from
Section 292B of the Income Tax Act and also from the judgment in
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: SEHAR HASEEN
Signing time: 1/12/2023
5:51:26 PM
2
the case of Home Finders Housing Ltd. Vs. ITO dt.
18.05.2018(SC), wherein it has been held that not passing order
on the objections of the assessee to the initiation of re-assessment
proceedings, is not a violation of law and is only a procedural
irregularity which can be cured by remitting the matter to authority
?
3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,
the ITAT was justified in law in deleting the addition of Rs.
4,36,68,123/- on account of speculation loss, while observing that
in the Income Tax proceedings, the principle of consistency has to
be followed, without appreciating that every assessment year is a
separate unit and has thus "de-facto" applied the principle of "res-
judicata" in the instant case ?
Issue notice to respondent(s) on payment of process fee by RAD
mode within seven working days. Notice be made returnable within four weeks.
List for final hearing in due course. Certified copy, as per rules.
(S. A. DHARMADHIKARI) (PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA)
JUDGE JUDGE
sh
Signature Not Verified Signed by: SEHAR HASEEN Signing time: 1/12/2023 5:51:26 PM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!