Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 782 MP
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
ON THE 12 th OF JANUARY, 2023
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 31667 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
AFZAL KHAN S/O JALAL KHAN 32/1, WARD NO. GRAM
BORLAI TEHSIL MOHAN BADODIYA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....APPLICANT
(BY SHRI SACHIN PARMAR - ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH STATION HOUSE
OFFICER THROUGH POLICE STATION KHACHROD,
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI PRANAY JOSHI - PANEL LAWYER)
This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the
following:
ORDER
The present petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved
by the order dated 13.06.2022 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Khachrod, District-Ujjain in Criminal Revision No.4/2022 whereby the revision filed by the petitioner has been dismissed and the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khachrod, Dist. Ujjain dated 07.05.2022 passed in Criminal Case No.58/2022 has been affirmed.
Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by The applicant is the owner of vehicle which has been found to be SAN SOUMYA RANJAN DALAI Date: 2023.01.12 18:32:09 IST involved in commission of offences punishable under Section 4, 6, 9 of M.P. Govansh Vadh Pratishedh Adhiniyam 2004 and 11(1)(G) of Prevention of
Cruelty Act 1960 and Section 34(2) of MP Excise Act. The Courts below have rejected the application for custody of the vehicle on supurdagi filed by the applicant on the ground that the Collector has already issued notices for confiscation to the applicant and, therefore, as per the bar under Section 47(D) of M.P. Excise Act, the application is not maintainable.
Counsel for the applicant submits that as per the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Premdas vs. State of MP & Ors. reported in (2013) 2 MPLJ 218 and order dated 04.11.2022 passed by coordinate Bench in WP No.23243/2022 (Manojsingh vs. State of MP & Ors), no confiscation of a vehicle can be made till the criminal case is finalized.
Admittedly, in the present case, the challenge is not made to the proceedings of confiscation initiated by the Collector. Further the Collector has not yet passed any order of confiscation. The applicant shall have liberty to raise all objections admissible under the law before the Collector and he may also file an application for interim custody of the vehicle in accordance with the law. This Court does not find any illegality in the order impugned.
With the aforesaid liberty, the application is disposed off. CC as per rules.
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE soumya
Signature Not Verified VerifiedDigitally Digitally signed by SAN SOUMYA RANJAN DALAI Date: 2023.01.12 18:32:09 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!