Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 509 MP
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ATUL SREEDHARAN
ON THE 9 th OF JANUARY, 2023
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 29 of 2008
BETWEEN:-
1. DEVISINGH S/O S/O HARNAM SINGH,CASTE-
RAGHUVANSHI , AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O
VILL. SYARI, TEH. GANJ BASODA, DISTT. VIDISHA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. GUDDA @ CHHOTA S/O HARNAM SINGH, AGED
ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O VILL. SYARI, TEH. GANJ
BASODA, DISTT. VIDISHA (MADHYA PRADESH).
3. BADA GUDDA S/O HARNAM SINGH, AGED ABOUT
25 YEARS, R/O VILL. SYARI, TEH. GANJ BASODA,
DISTT. VIDISHA (MADHYA PRADESH).
.....PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI SUSHIL GOSWAMI - ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICE
STATION GANJBASODA DISTT. VIDISHA (MADHYA
PRADESH).
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI RAJIV UPADHAYAY - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR)
Th is revision coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
The present petition has been filed in the year 2008 being aggrieved by the order dated 05.01.2008 passed by the Appellate Court which has dismissed the Criminal Appeal No.44/2007 filed by the petitioner whereby upholding the order dated 06.03.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Signature Not Verified Signed by: RASHID KHAN Signing time: 10-Jan-23 10:36:05 AM
Ganjbasoda, District Vidisha whereby the petitioners herein have been convicted for an offence under Section 325/34 of the I.P.C. and sentenced to suffer one year' rigorous imprisonment, which was reduced by the Appellate Court to six months and fine of Rs.500/- each.
The record of the case does not show that this is a fit case for interference by this Court under the revisional jurisdiction as the Appellate Court by its reasoned order upheld the order passed by the learned trial Court. However, taking the delay in disposing of this petition into congnizance, the ends of justice would be served better if the fine amount is enhanced.
Under the circumstances, the sentence of the petitioners is reduced to the
period already undergone by them from 05.01.2008 (date of judgment of appellate Court) till they were granted suspension by this Court on 23.01.2008. However, each of the petitioners shall pay defacto complainant Rs.5000/- each, if the complainant is not alive, to the next of his kin within sixty days from the date of this order. If the same is not complied with as hereinabove, the trial Court shall take them into custody to make them complete their remaining part of the sentence.
With the above, this petition is disposed of.
(ATUL SREEDHARAN) JUDGE Rashid
Signature Not Verified Signed by: RASHID KHAN Signing time: 10-Jan-23 10:36:05 AM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!