Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 461 MP
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL
ON THE 9th OF JANUARY, 2023
CRIMINAL REVISION NO.568 OF 2008
BETWEEN:-
1. BISHAN SINGH, S/O KANHAIYYARAM
KUSHWAHA, AGED 27 YEARS, R/O
VILLAGE BANIYAI, POLICE STATION-
ASHOKNAGAR, DISTRICT- ASHOKNAGAR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. PAPPU, S/O RAMCHARAN, AGED 32
YEARS, R/O VILLAGE BANIYAI, POLICE
STATION- ASHOKNAGAR, DISTRICT-
ASHOKNAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. SURESH, S/O KANHAIYYARAM
KUSHWAHA, AGED 27 YEARS, R/O
VILLAGE BANIYAI, POLICE STATION-
ASHOKNAGAR, DISTRICT- ASHOKNAGAR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
........PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI RAJIV JAIN - ADVOCATE)
AND
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
POLICE STATION- ASHOKNAGAR,
DISTRICT- ASHOKNAGAR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
........RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI B.M. SHRIVASTAVA- PUBLIC PROSECUTOR)
2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This revision coming on for orders this day, the Court passed the
following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORDER
This revision is pending since 2008. This revision has been filed by the petitioners against the judgment dated 19/08/2008 passed by 1 st Additional Sessions Judge, District- Ashoknagar (M.P.) in Criminal Appeal No.267/2008, affirming the order dated 25/06/2008 passed in Criminal Case No.315/2005 by JMFC, Ashoknagar, District- Ashoknagar (M.P.), whereby the petitioners have been convicted and sentenced as under:-
Section Sentence Fine (Rs.) Default
Stipulation
325/34 of IPC (two counts) 1 Year RI 1,00/- 15 Days RI
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that incident is of the year 2004 and more than 18 years have lapsed. Learned counsel for the petitioners confined his argument only to the point of sentence and prays that the sentence awarded to them modified to the extent that period already undergone by them would be sufficient to meet the ends of justice.
Learned counsel for the respondent/State while opposing the petition has submitted that the learned trial Court as well as Appellate Court have arrived on the appropriate findings and rightly passed the impugned judgments of conviction and sentence.
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, ends of justice
would meet if while reducing the jail sentence of the petitioners to the period already undergone by them, the fine is enhanced from Rs.100/- to Rs.3,000/- each for the offence under Section 325/34 of IPC. Accordingly, while affirming the conviction of the petitioners under Section 325/34 of IPC, jail sentence of the petitioners is reduced to the period already undergone by them but fine amount is enhanced from Rs.1,00/- to Rs.3,000/- each which shall be deposited by them within a period of one month from today, failing which the petitioners will have to suffer the complete sentence as awarded by the Courts below. The amount of fine so deposited by the petitioners be given to the complainant under Section 357 of Cr.P.C on due verification of identity of the complainant.
In view of the above, this appeal is finally disposed of. Certified copy as per rules.
(DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL) JUDGE
rahul Digitally signed by RAHUL SINGH PARIHAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, ou=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, postalCode=474001, st=Madhya Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=eac942476567cd1b39b3da46068403462fdf82ab676d0c de4dee473fe77953f5, pseudonym=68E0B84BAE73376CD071289B3D9FE728CE00D487, serialNumber=0275C4F803F94C47998BE5C534E21BDED910FD4A B9D159B55575E814D05B2EED, cn=RAHUL SINGH PARIHAR Date: 2023.01.11 17:26:45 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!