Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 247 MP
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT
ON THE 4 th OF JANUARY, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 3120 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
MADHUKAR CHOUHAN S/O LATE GANGARAM
CHOUHAN, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
UPPER DIVISION TEACHER R/O WCL COLONY
BHARTADEV ROAD CHANDANGAON, DISTT.
CHHINDWARA (MP) (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI DEVESH BHOJNE - ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TRIBAL WELFARE
DEPARTMENT VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL M.P.
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. THE STATE OF M.P. THROUGH THE SECRETARY
VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL M.P. (MADHYA
PRADESH)
3. THE COMMISSIONER TRIBAL WELFARE
DEPARTMENT SATPURA BHAWAN BHOPAL M.P.
(MADHYA PRADESH)
4. JOINT DIRECTOR TREASURY AND ACCOUNT
JABALPUR JABALPUR DIVISION JABALPUR M.P.
(MADHYA PRADESH)
5. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER
CHHIN D WAR A DISTRICT CHHINDWARA M.P.
(MADHYA PRADESH)
6. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TRIBAL
WELFARE DEPARTMENT DISTRICT
CHHINDWARA M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER CHHINDWARA
BICCHUA TEHSIL BICCHUA DISTRICT
2
CHHINDWARA M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI K.S. BAGHEL - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
Petitioner has filed present writ petition under Section 226 of the Constitution of India making a prayer that petitioner be granted regular pay scale from initial date of appointment as per judgment passed in WA No.346/2008 [Smt. Usha Ranawat Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and another].
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that petitioner
was appointed on the post of Up-shikshak on 21.11.1981 on fixed pay scale and was regularized on 23.06.1983. He preferred a representation dated 12.07.2021 (Annexure-P/2) before respondent No.6 but same was not considered. Petitioner's case is covered by judgment passed in WA No.346/2008 [Smt. Usha Ranawat Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and another].
3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for State does not deny the aforesaid proposition.
4. Heard the counsel for the parties.
5. In view of aforesaid circumstances, writ petition is disposed of directing respondents to consider and decide the case of petitioner in light of judgment passed in WA No.346/2008 [Smt. Usha Ranawat Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and another] by passing a reasonable and speaking order within a period of 45 days from date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
6. No opinion is expressed on the merits of the case.
7. With aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of.
8. Certified copy as per rules.
(VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE shabana SHABANA Digitally signed by SHABANA ANSARI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, ou=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, postalCode=482001, st=Madhya Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=4bc06f2e678b75148b60bb7947ee9ffc5ed27ef1f4 3a5d4d93d2d13dda510735,
ANSARI pseudonym=B646F86821C200C9792A53984F1D0790135D E39A, serialNumber=8A5E15A33816E651B4DB52BF3225281EF6C 191F68E5EBE90A6E101CF42422711, cn=SHABANA ANSARI Date: 2023.01.04 16:18:12 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!