Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2858 MP
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
&
JUSTICE AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI)
ON THE 16 th OF FEBRUARY, 2023
MISC. PETITION No. 568 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
1. M/S NARAYAN INDUSTRIES A PROPRIETORSHIP
CONCERN THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI
NARAYAN DAS TOLANI NEAR GAYATRI MANDIR
L A L B A R R A ROAD WARASEONI BALAGHAT
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. SHRI NARAYAN DAS TOLANI S/O LATE SHRI
HUNDAMAL TOLANI RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 7
LALBARRA ROAD WARASEONI BALAGHAT 481001
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. SMT. BHARTI TALANI S/O SHRI NARAYAN DAS
TALANI RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 7 LALBARRA
ROAD WARASEONI BALAGHAT 481001 (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI SATISH AGRAWAL - ADVOCATE)
AND
STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS AUTHRORISED
OFFICER WARASEONI BRANCH BALAGHAT (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(NONE )
Th is petition coming on for admission this day, JUSTICE SUJOY
PAUL passed the following:
ORDER
Heard.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: PARITOSH KUMAR Signing time: 2/17/2023 5:33:57 PM
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner intends to file appropriate application / proceeding before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) as per the observation made by Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) in order dated 09.01.2023 (Annexure P/7). He submits that petitioner will promptly file an appropriate application before the DRT along with stay application. Till such time stay application is decided, petitioner may be protected by granting interim relief.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file appropriate application before the DRT.
So far the prayer for interim relief for the interregnum period is
concerned, we have recently declined similar prayer in W.P. No. 22507/ 2022 ( Rahul Gupta Vs. Central Bank of India Bhopal and Anr.) on the basis of judgment of Supreme Court in Kalabharati Advertising vs. Hemant Vimalnath Narichania and others (2010) 9 SCC 437. It was poignantly held as under :-
"22. It is a settled legal proposition that the forum of the writ court cannot be used for the purpose of giving interim relief as the only and the final relief to any litigant. If the court comes to the conclusion that the matter requires adjudication by some other appropriate forum and relegates the said party to that forum, it should not grant any interim relief in favour of such a litigant for an interregnum period till the said party approaches the alternative forum and obtains interim relief."
(Emphasis supplied)
Thus, prayer for interim relief is declined.
(SUJOY PAUL) (AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI))
JUDGE JUDGE
PK
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: PARITOSH
KUMAR
Signing time: 2/17/2023
5:33:57 PM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!