Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Raju Tomar @ Rajusingh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2023 Latest Caselaw 2397 MP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2397 MP
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2023

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Raju Tomar @ Rajusingh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 February, 2023
Author: Rohit Arya
                                                              1
                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                      AT GWALIOR
                                                      CRA No. 1108 of 2015
                                   (RAJU TOMAR @ RAJUSINGH AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)

                          Dated : 10-02-2023
                                Shri R.K. Sharma-Senior Advocate with Shri V.K. Agrawal-Advocate

                          for the appellant.
                                Shri Rajesh Shukla-Deputy Advocate General for respondent/State.

Heard on IA No.10006 of 2019, which is second repeat application filed o n behalf of appellant No.2-Rajendra Singh under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C

seeking suspension of sentence and grant of bail.

Appellant No.2-Rajendra Singh stood convicted under Sections 148 and 302/149 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for three years with a fine of Rs.2,000/- and imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.10,000/-with default stipulations vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.09.2015 by Additional Sessions Judge, Gohad, District Bhind (M.P.), in Sessions Trial No.144/2011.

Appellant No.2-Rajendra Singh has so far undergone incarceration of about 11 years including the period suffered during trial.

As per prosecution story, on 27.07.2010 at about 11 am Samrath Singh, son of the complainant, was ploughing his field. After turning off the tractor, he was going towards the bore lying near the home of Narayan Kori to drink water. There is a boundary near the house of Narayan Kori and moor (beehad) is adjacent to it. Accused persons Rajenra Singh, Raju, Surendra Singh, Lala and Dileep were present behind the moor (beehad). Rajendra Singh (present appellant) and co-accused Surendra Singh were alleged to have fired by means of their 12 bore guns with an intention to kill, out of which one bullet hit the Signature Not Verified Signed by: PAWAN DHARKAR Signing time: 2/10/2023 6:24:23 PM

chest of Samrath Singh due to which he fell down on the ground. Accused Dilip Singh inflicted Dhariya blow on the right knee of Samrath Singh which caused incised wound to him. Co-accused Lala also fired by means of country made gun (katta) which hit his elbow of left hand, co-accused Raju hit him by means means of Dhariya which caused injury to him on thigh of left leg due to which blood started oozing out. Complainant Feran Singh was also present near the spot who because of fear hided himself. The incident was also witnessed by Karan Singh Tomar and Rakesh Singh Tomar. On the aforesaid allegations, FIR was lodged. After completion of investigation, charge-sheet was filed and the case was committed to the Sessions Court. The Sessions Court upon critical

evaluation of the evidence placed on record convicted and sentenced appellant No.2 as referred above.

Learned counsel for appellant No.2 while taking exception to the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence submits that appellant No.2 is innocent and has falsely been implicated. The Sessions Court did not appreciate the relevant piece of evidence. The judgment is based on surmises and conjectures. According to learned Senior counsel, allegation against appellant No.2-Rajendra Singh Tomar of using firearm which formed basis of his conviction is de hors the evidence available on record. It is further submitted that similar allegation was made against the co-accused-Surendra Singh Tomar who has since been extended the benefit of suspension of sentence and grant of bail vide order dated 04.05.2018 in Criminal Appeal No.1107/2015, hence, prays for suspension of sentence and grant of bail.

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent-State opposes the application with submission that no fault can be found with the conviction

Signature Not Verified ordered by the Sessions Court under Section 302 read with 149 of IPC as all Signed by: PAWAN DHARKAR Signing time: 2/10/2023 6:24:23 PM

the accused persons with common object had assaulted the deceased resulting into homicidal death. Thus, no exception can be taken in the matter of grant of suspension of jail sentence to appellant No.2-Rajendra Singh.

Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, though this Court refrains from commenting upon rival contentions so advanced touching merits of the case, regard being had to the fact that present appellant has suffered incarceration of about 11 years coupled with the fact that co-accused Surendra Singh Tomar has since been extended the benefit of bail vide order dated 04.05.2018 in Criminal Appeal No.1107/2015; present appeal is of the year 2015 and there is no likelihood of early hearing of the appeal, in the obtaining facts and circumstances, appellant No.2 is held entitled for suspension of jail sentence.

Accordingly, we allow IA No.10006 of 2019 and it is directed that the jail sentence of appellant No.2 - Rajendra Singh shall remain suspended during pendency of present appeal and he be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lacs only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court subject to verification of factum regarding deposit of fine amount. Appellant No.2 is directed to appear before the Registry of this Court first on 20.04.2023 and on other subsequent dates as may be fixed in this behalf with following further

conditions:-

( i) the concerned jail authorities are directed that before releasing the appellant, the medical examination of appellant No.2 be conducted through the jail doctor and if it is prima facie found that he is having any symptoms of COVID-19, then the consequential follow up action or any further test required be undertaken immediately. If not, appellant shall be released on bail in terms of the conditions imposed in this Signature Not Verified Signed by: PAWAN DHARKAR Signing time: 2/10/2023 6:24:23 PM

order ;

(ii) violation of conditions, State is free to apply for cancellation of bail.

Accordingly, IA No.10006 of 2019 stands allowed and disposed of.

Observations on facts, if any, are only for the purpose of deciding the instant I.A. and shall have no bearing on the merits of the appeal.

Certified copy as per rules.

                               (ROHIT ARYA)                               (SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH)
                                  JUDGE                                            JUDGE

                          pd




Signature Not Verified
Signed by: PAWAN
DHARKAR
Signing time: 2/10/2023
6:24:23 PM
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter