Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1831 MP
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
ON THE 1 st OF FEBRUARY, 2023
MISC. PETITION No. 3340 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD THROUGH
DENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER INDERGANJ
CHORAHA GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI S.GAJENDRAGADHKAR - ADVOCATE)
AND
1. SMT ASHA KAVET W/O LT SHRI HARPRASAD
KAVET, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, GRAM ALGI
KARERA DISTT SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. KU VERSHA KAVET (MINOR) THROUGH THEIR
GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT ASHA KAVET D/O LATE
SHRI HARPRASAD KAVET, AGED ABOUT 16
Y E A R S , GRAM ALGI, KARERA, SHIVPURI
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. KU RADHA KAVET (MINOR) THROUGH MOTHER
SMT ASHA KAVET D/O LATE SHRI HARPRASAD
KAVET, AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS, GRAM ALGI,
KARERA, SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. SUMI KAVET (MINOR) THROUGH MOTHER SMT
ASHA KAVET S/O LATE SHRI HARPRASAD KAVET,
AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS, GRAM ALGI, KARERA,
SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. RATAN LAL KAVET S/O LATE SHRI HARPRASAD
K A V E T GRAM ALGI, KARERA, SHIVPURI
(MADHYA PRADESH)
6. RAMPYARI KAVET W/O SHRI RATANLAL KAVET
GRAM ALGI, KARERA, SHIVPURI (MADHYA
PRADESH)
7. RAVI KAVET S/O SHRI RATANLAL KAVET, AGED
2
ABOUT 28 YEARS, GRAM ALGI, KARERA,
SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)
8. PRAN SINGH KAVET S/O SHRI HARPAL KAVET
GRAM OR POST KARAHI THE. NARWAR,
SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI ASHOK KUMAR RATHORE - ADVOCATE)
This petition coming on for HEARING this day, the court passed the
following:
ORDER
Present petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 12.07.2022 passed by learned VIII
Member, MACT, Gwalior, whereby, the applications filed by the petitioner Insurance Co. for review of the award dated 11.12.2021 passed in Lok Adalat in Claim Case No.771/2020 (Smt. Asha Kavet and Ors. Vs. Ravi Kavet) has been dismissed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that under bonafide mistake, the compromise was entered into in Lok Adalat dated 11.12.2021 whereas, later on, it was found that it was a case of pillion rider whose liability was not covered under insurance policy and in that context, review petition was preferred before the trial Court but the same was dismissed on the ground of jurisdiction. Hence, this present petition has been preferred.
While placing reliance upon the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.1022 of 2015 (New Insurance Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. parwati and Ors), learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in such cases, this Hon'ble Court had recalled the order passed in Lok Adalat and had restored the claim case on it's original number.
The factual position and the order passed by this Court in aforesaid Writ
Petition is not opposed by counsel for the respondents and he submits that the order passed in Lok Adalat, may be recalled and the Claim Case No.771 of 2020 be directed to be listed on it's original number for it's adjudication on merits.
Upon hearing counsel for the parties and in the light of the concession given by counsel for the respondents, the petition is allowed. The order passed in Lok Adalat dated 12.07.2022 is hereby recalled. Claim Case No.771 of 2020 is restored to it's original number for adjudication on it's own merits.
With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.
(MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) JUDGE Rks
RAM KUMAR SHARMA 2023.02.01 18:35:24 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!