Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 22701 MP
Judgement Date : 28 December, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH
ON THE 28 th OF DECEMBER, 2023
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 615 of 2015
BETWEEN:-
SAHAB SINGH S/O SHRI KAPTAN SINGH GURJAR, AGED
60 YEARS, R/O GRAM BUDHAWALI PS. BAGCHINI
DISTRICT MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPELLANT
(BY SHRI S.P.S. KUSHWAH - ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICE
STATION BAGCHINI DISTRICT MORENA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
(BY MRS.KALPANA PARMAR - PANEL LAWYER)
Th is appeal coming on for hearing this day, t h e court passed the
following:
ORDER
1. This criminal appeal under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by
the appellant against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.06.2015 passed by learned First Additional Sessions Judge, District Morena in S.T.No.08/2015, whereby the trial Court has acquitted the present appellant- Sahab Singh and co-accused persons- Vishambar, Bhura @ Ramnaresh, Satendra Singh, Vinod, Ballu Gurjar under Sections 148, 307/149, 307(part-
1)/149 but has convicted the appellant-Sahab Singh under Section 25(1-b)(a) of Arms Act and sentenced to undergo one year RI with fine of Rs.10,000/-, with
default stipulation.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant remained in custody for 5 days. Although this appeal has been filed on merits but today, learned counsel for the appellant pressed the appeal only regarding sentence part is concerned and do not press the conviction part as mentioned above.
3. Learned counsel for the State has no objection if sentence of appellants is converted to undergone.
4. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the record.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts and looking to the nature of offence, this Court is of the considered view that the ends of justice would be met if the jail sentence awarded to the appellant is set aside while retaining the fine amount.
Accordingly, the appeal deserves to be partly allowed. While maintaining the appellant's conviction for offence under Section 25(1-b)(a) of Arms Act, the sentence awarded to him is hereby reduced to the period already undergone by him which is of 5 days. The fine amount imposed by the trial Court for offence under Section 25(1-b)(a) of Arms Act is not disturbed. The appellant is set free and his bail bonds and surety bonds, if any, are discharged.
6. Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of and rest of the impugned judgment is kept intact.
7. Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for information.
(AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH) V. JUDGE Adnan
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!