Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 22507 MP
Judgement Date : 27 December, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH
ON THE 27 th OF DECEMBER, 2023
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 691 of 2008
BETWEEN:-
1. RAGHUVEER LODHI S/O SHRI SRIPAT LODHI,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE TAPRIAN
MAHOBA P.S. BHONTI DISTT. SHIVPURI (MADHYA
PRADESH)
2. HAZARATH LODHI S/O SRIPAT LODHI, AGED
ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O VILL. TAPRIAN MAHOBA
P.S. BHOTI DISTT. SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPELLANTS
(BY SHRI JITENDRA TYAGI - ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF M.P. THROUGH P.S. BHONTI, DISTRICT
SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI V.P.S. TOMAR - PANEL LAWYER)
Th is appeal coming on for hearing this day, t h e court passed the
following:
ORDER
This criminal appeal under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the appellant against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 04.09.2008 passed by learned Special Sessions Judge (SC/ST Act), District Shivpuri in S.T.No.135/2006, whereby appellant No.1-Raghuveer Lodhi has been convicted under Section 323 IPC and sentenced to undergo three months RI with fine of Rs.1,000/- and appellant No.2-Hazarath Lodhi has been
convicted under Section 324 IPC and sentenced to undergo six months RI with
fine of Rs.2,000/-, with default stipulations.
2 . Learned counsel for the appellants submits that both the appellants were remained in custody for 5-5 days. He further submits that his only prayer is that fine amount may be enhanced.
3. Learned counsel for the State has no objection if sentence of appellants is converted to undergone.
4. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the record.
5. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and perusal of record and in considered view of this Court, the trial Court has properly recorded the conviction of the appellants as mentioned hereinabove. Hence,
their conviction is hereby affirmed; however, regarding quantum of sentence, by setting aside jail sentence of appellant No.1-Raghuveer Lodhi fine amount is maintained, fine amount of appellant No.2-Hazarath Lodhi under Section 324 IPC is enhanced from Rs.2,000/- to Rs.4,000/- and if fine amount as imposed by the trial Court has already been deposited by the appellants, same be adjusted. If appellants deposit fine amount as directed hereinabove within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, as the jail sentence of appellants has already been suspended, their bail bonds shall stand discharged and if they fails to deposit the fine amount, they have to undergo total jail sentence of four months. The amount of fine so deposited by the appellants be given to Sheelabai as compensation.
6. Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of.
7. Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for information.
(AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH) JUDGE Adnan
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!