Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 21968 MP
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL
ON THE 20 th OF DECEMBER, 2023
SECOND APPEAL No. 734 of 2021
BETWEEN:-
RAMRAJ SINGH, S/O SHRI HARI BHAJAN SINGH
PARIHAR, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
AGRICULTURIST R/O VILLAGE KOTAR KALA, NEAR
STATE BANK, SIDHI TEHSIL GOPADBANS DISTRICT-
SIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPELLANT
(BY SHRI ASHOK KUMAR JAIN - ADVOCATE )
AND
1. HARIDAS S/O VISHESHAR GUPTA, AGED ABOUT
59 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST R/O
VILLAGE MORCHA TEHSIL GOPADBANAS
DISTRICT- SIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. MEWALAL S/O VISHESHAR GUPTA, AGED ABOUT
74 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE R/O
VILLAGE MORCHA TEHSIL GOPADBANAS,
DISTRICT- SIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. RAMSHARAN S/O VISHESHAR GUPTA, AGED
ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE
R/O VILLAGE MORCHA TEHSIL
GOPAD B AN AS , DISTRICT- SIDHI (MADHYA
PRADESH)
4. NANDLAL S/O VISHESHAR GUPTA, AGED ABOUT
51 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE R/O
VILLAGE MORCHA TEHSIL
GOPAD B AN AS , DISTRICT- SIDHI (MADHYA
PRADESH)
5. MST.NANHU DEVI W/O LATE RAMLAKHAN, AGED
ABOUT 71 YEARS, VILLAGE PATEL PULL KOTAHA
SIDHI TEH.GOPADBANAS, DISTRICT- SIDHI
(MADHYA PRADESH)
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: VAISHALI
AGRAWAL
Signing time: 12/21/2023
5:53:51 PM
2
6. ANUSUIYA PRASAD S/O LATE RAMLAKHAN,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, VILLAGE PATEL PULL
KOTAHA SIDHI TEH.GOPADBANAS, DISTRICT-
SIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)
7. RAMJEET S/O LATE RAMLAKHAN BANI, AGED
ABOUT 40 YEARS, VILLAGE PATEL PULL KOTAHA
SIDHI TEH.GOPADBANAS, DISTRICT- SIDHI
(MADHYA PRADESH)
8. GEETA D/O LATE RAMLAKHAN, AGED ABOUT 30
YEAR S, VILLAGE PATEL PULL KOTAHA SIDHI
TEH.GOPADBANAS, DISTRICT- SIDHI (MADHYA
PRADESH)
9. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
C O L L E C T O R DISTRICT- SIDHI (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(MS. KAJOL JAISWAL AND SHRI HIMANSHU SHUKLA - ADVOCATES FOR
RESPONDENT 1 AND SHRI SANDEEP DUBEY - PANEL LAWYER FOR THE
RESPONDENT 9/STATE)
This appeal coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
This second appeal has been preferred by appellant/defendant 1- Ramraj Singh challenging the judgment and decree dated 06.03.2021 passed by 4th Additional District Judge, Sidhi in Civil Appeal No. 46A/2014 reversing the judgment and decree dated 03.07.2014 passed by 1st Civil Judge Class-I, Sidhi, District Sidhi in Civil Suit No.7A/2010, whereby trial Court decreed the respondent 1/plaintiff's suit for declaration of title and for declaring the sale deed dated 24.08.1998 null & void executed by defendants 2-6 in favour of defendant 1/appellant-Ramraj Singh, which upon filing civil appeal by defendant 1-Ramraj Singh has been reversed by dismissing the suit in toto.
2. After arguments at length, learned counsel for the appellant/defendant 1 submits that since decree is in favour of appellant/defendant 1, therefore he
does not want to press this second appeal.
3. Accordingly, second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed off.
(DWARKA DHISH BANSAL) JUDGE vai
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!