Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Zeeshan @ Siddique vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2023 Latest Caselaw 13896 MP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13896 MP
Judgement Date : 24 August, 2023

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Zeeshan @ Siddique vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 24 August, 2023
Author: Rohit Arya
                                    1
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                          AT GWALIOR
                             CRA No. 5062 of 2019
                 (ZEESHAN @ SIDDIQUE Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)

Dated : 24-08-2023
       Shri Jitendra Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant.

       Shri Sushant Tiwari, learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.

Heard o n I.A. No.13969 of 2023, an application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. moved on behalf of the appellant for suspension of sentence and grant of bail.

Appellant stands convicted under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section

376-D of IPC (but sentenced to undergo 20 years' RI with fine of Rs.5000/- under Section 376-D of IPC), Section 450 of IPC and sentenced to undergo 05 years' RI with fine of Rs.1000/-, Section 457 of IPC and sentenced to undergo 05 years' RI with fine of Rs.1000/- with default stipulations respectively vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 14-05-2019 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO Act), Mungawali, District-Ashoknagar in Special Sessions Trial No.05/2015.

As per prosecution story, on 16-02-2015 while prosecutrix alongwith her sister was sleeping in her house in a room on 2nd floor, at about 04:00 in the

early morning, accused/ appellants Zeeshan @ Siddique and Dinesh entered the room from the window. Accused Dinesh caught hold of hand of prosecutrix and accused present appellant-Zeeshan committed rape over the prosecutrix. On screaming of prosecutrix, her tenant-Halke woke up and he closed the window and door from outside. Her parents also woke up and they caught the accused persons on the spot and taken them to the Police Station. On the basis of aforesaid, FIR was registered at Police Station Mungawali. After completion

of investigation, charge sheet was filed and the case was committed to the Sessions Court. The Sessions Court upon critical evaluation of the evidence placed on record has convicted and sentenced the appellant as referred above.

Learned counsel for the appellant while taking exception to the impugned judgment submits that he has been falsely implicated in the case. No DNA test was conducted by the prosecution to prove the rape by the appellant. Besides, there is no independent witness except that of Halke Kushwaha (PW-17); tenant of the prosecutrix, who also has turned hostile during trial. As such, the impugned judgment is based on surmises and conjecture Moreso, appellant so far has undergone 07 years and 08 months' incarceration including remission

period. Under such circumstances, learned counsel prays for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the appellant.

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent-State opposes the application with submission that prosecutrix was minor at the time of incident, hence, no indulgence can be given in the matter of suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the appellant.

Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, though this Court refrains from commenting upon rival contentions so advanced touching merits of the case, but regard being had to the obtaining facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that appellant so far has suffered 07 years' and 08 months' incarceration, I.A. No.13969 of 2023 is allowed. Accordingly, it is directed that the jail sentence of the appellant shall remain suspended during pendency of present appeal and he be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court subject to verification of factum regarding deposit of fine amount. Appellant is directed to appear before

the Registry of this Court first on 11-10-2023 and on other subsequent dates as may be fixed in this behalf.

Accordingly, I.A. No.13969 of 2023 stands allowed and disposed of. Observations on facts, if any, are only for the purpose of deciding the instant I.A. and shall have no bearing on the merits of the appeal.

Certified copy as per rules.

     (ROHIT ARYA)                                 (SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR)
        JUDGE                                              JUDGE

vc




       VARSHA
       CHATURVEDI
       2023.08.25
       10:45:36
       +05'30'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter