Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13013 MP
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
CRA No. 199 of 2017
(Kallu Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR)
Gwalior dated 10.8.2023
Shri Sushil Goswami, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri A.K.Nirankari, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.
Per Justice Deepak Kumar Agarwal:
IA.No.30778/2021, 1st application u/Sec. 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for
suspension of sentence and grant of bail filed on behalf of appellant-
Kallu.
This criminal appeal assails the judgment dated 23.12.2016 passed
by the Special Judge, Vidisha, in Special Case No.76/2014, whereby
appellant has been convicted under Sections 363, 366, 376(1), 324 of IPC
and Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(1)(xii) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act with maximum sentence of life
imprisonment.
Prosecution case in brief is that prosecutrix aged 17 years on
4.3.2014 at 7.45 am lodged a report at police Station Tyonda Distt.
Vidisha to the effect that on 3.3.2014 at 9 pm when she had gone to Signature Not Verified Signed by: MADHU SOODAN PRASAD answer the call of nature, appellant met and by persuading took her to his Signing time: 10-08-2023 04:22:50 PM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
house and by threatening asked her to sleep there, due to fear she slept
there. At 11 pm appellant awoke her and committed rape with her. Her
mother while searching her came there, but appellant was not allowing
her to go with her mother. Anyhow she could manage to go with her
mother. Appellant bit her at face and breasts. On her report, crime was
registered. She was sent for medical examination. After investigation,
charge-sheet has been filed and after trial appellant has been convicted &
sentenced as aforesaid.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that during trial
appellant was on bail, but he did not misuse the liberty so granted. During
trial, he remained in custody from 6.3.2014 to 10.8.2015 and thereafter
from the date of judgment i.e. 23.12.2016 he is in custody, thus he has
already suffered more than 8 years incarceration. He has a good case on
merits. Final hearing of the appeal will take time. On such premises,
learned counsel for the appellant prayed for bail.
Learned counsel for the State opposed the application and prayed
for its rejection.
Signature Not Verified Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, but without Signed by: MADHU SOODAN PRASAD Signing time: 10-08-2023 04:22:50 PM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
commenting anything on the merits of the case, IA.No.30778/2021 is
allowed and it is directed that jail sentence of appellant - Kallu will
remain under suspension subject to verification that the amount of fine
has been deposited, on appellant's furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/-
(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like
amount to the satisfaction of concerned Trial Court for his appearance
before the Principal Registrar of this Court on 18th December, 2023 and
thereafter on such further dates as may be fixed by the office of this Court
in this regard till disposal of the appeal.
C.c. as per rules.
(Rohit Arya) (Deepak Kumar Agarwal)
Judge Judge
ms/-
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: MADHU
SOODAN PRASAD
Signing time: 10-08-2023
04:22:50 PM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!