Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12250 MP
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK
ON THE 1 st OF AUGUST, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 18655 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
ASHOK SHIVHARE S/O SHRI BHAROSILAL SHIVHARE,
AGED 58 YEARS, R/O PURANI COLONY BANMORE
MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI S.K. SHRIVASTAVA- ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
HOME, VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL MP
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. SMT MUNNI DEVI W/O LATE SHRI MOHAR
SINGH, AGED 65 YEARS, OCCUPATION- HOUSE
W I F E R/O SAXENA KA PURA, BANMORE,
DISTRICT MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. SMT LAXMI KHARE W/O LATE SHRI VINOD
KHARE D/O MOHAR SINGH, AGED 45 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: PRIVATE SERVICE R/O SAXENA KA
PURA, BANMORE, DISTRICT MORENA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
4. SUNDAR SINGH S/O LATE SHRI MOHAR SINGH,
AGED 36 YEARS, OCCUPATION LABOUR R/O
SAXENA KA PURA, BANMORE, DISTRICT
MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. ASHA D/O LATE SHRI MOHAR SINGH, AGED 30
YEARS, OCCUPATION- LABOUR R/O SAXENA KA
PURA, BANMORE, DISTRICT MORENA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
6. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL BANMORE, THROUGH
CHIEF MUNICIPAL OFFICER BANMORE,
DISTRICT MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH)
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: VISHAL
UPADHYAY
Signing time: 8/2/2023
11:47:26 AM
2
7. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MORENA
DISTRICT MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH)
8. STATION HOUSE OFFICER POLICE STATION
BANMORE, DISTRICT MORENA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
9. CO LLECTO R MORENA DISTRICT MORENA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI NILESH SINGH TOMAR- GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR
RESPONDENT/STATE)
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner referred judgement and decree passed by trial court vide judgment dated 16.01.2012 by First Appellate Court judgement and decree dated 21.09.2013 and judgement passed by this Court in the case of Second Appeal 467/2013 vide order dated 15.03.2023 and submitted that petitioner has judgment and decree in his favor in respect of declaration of permanent injunction, but he is being denied access to construct his house over the suit property which he already won through court proceedings. He relied upon the judgement of the Apex Court passed in the case of P.R. Murlidharan & Ors vs Swami Dharmananda Theertha Padar and others, 2006 4 SCC 501, and submitted that in such matters writ is maintainable. He also preferred a representation in this regard.
Learned counsel for respondent/State opposed the prayer and submitted that petitioner has alternative remedy available to him.
Heard counsel for the rival parties and perused the documents appended thereto.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: VISHAL UPADHYAY Signing time: 8/2/2023 11:47:26 AM
Considering the rival submissions and looking to the nature of reliefs, it is in the interest of justice that petitioner may avail his other remedies as available to him in accordance with law including the remedy to approach the respondents.
Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(ANAND PATHAK) JUDGE Vishal
Signature Not Verified Signed by: VISHAL UPADHYAY Signing time: 8/2/2023 11:47:26 AM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!