Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6558 MP
Judgement Date : 24 April, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL
ON THE 24 th OF APRIL, 2023
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 191 of 2005
BETWEEN:-
1. RANJEET S/O KAMAL SINGH, AGED ABOUT 19
YEARS, OCCUPATION: AG VILLAGE AMBARI PS
DINARA (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. LAXMAN SINGH S/O GAYA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT
56 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE GRAM
AMBARI P.S. DINARA (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. MUNNA LAL S/O GAYAPRASAD, AGED ABOUT 35
YE A R S , OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE GRAM
AMBARI THANA DINARA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPELLANT
(SHRI ARUN PATERIYA, ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF M.P. INCHARGE POLICE STATION PS
DINARA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(SHRI PRAMOD PACHORI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR)
This appeal coming on for final hearing this day, the court passed the
following:
ORDER
This criminal appeal has been filed by the appellants against the judgment dated 15.02.2005 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Karera District Shivpuri in S.T. No.112/2002 by which appellants have been convicted under Sections 307/34 of IPC (on two counts) and sentenced him to undergo seven years R.I. with fine of Rs.500/- each with default stipulation. Signature Not Verified Signed by: YOGENDRA OJHA Signing time: 4/27/2023 6:00:42 PM
Learned counsel for the appellants submitts that he does not want to challenge the conviction of the appellants for the aforesaid offence. As regards sentence, it is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that incident took place on 20.01.2002 and appellants have been facing agony of trial for more than 21 years. Appellants have already suffered incarceration of three months and seventeen days. Amount of fine has been deposited by them. Therefore, while enhancing the fine amount suitably, sentence of the appellants be reduced to the period already undergone by them.
Learned counsel for the State objected the prayer made by learned counsel for the respondent.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment.
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, ends of justice would meet if while reducing the jail sentence of the appellants to the period already undergone by them, the fine is enhanced to Rs.15,000/- under Section 307/34 of IPC in regard to each of the complainants. Accordingly, while affirming the conviction of the appellants under Section 307/34 of IPC, jail sentence of the appellants is reduced to the period already undergone by them and fine amount is enhanced to Rs.15,000/- under Section 307/34 of IPC in regard to each of the complainants which shall be deposited by them within a period of two months from today, failing which the appellants will have to suffer the sentence as awarded by the Court below. The amount of fine so deposited by the appellants be given to each of the complainants under Section 357 of Cr.P.C. as compensation.
With the aforesaid, the criminal appeal stands disposed of.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: YOGENDRA OJHA Signing time: 4/27/2023 6:00:42 PM
(DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL) JUDGE ojha
Signature Not Verified Signed by: YOGENDRA OJHA Signing time: 4/27/2023 6:00:42 PM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!