Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13791 MP
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA
ON THE 18th OF OCTOBER, 2022
WRIT PETITION No. 22549 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
PARMANAND DUBEY S/O D.P.DUBEY, AGED
ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCCUPATION: ASSISTANT
GRADE III MADHYA PRADESH POORVA
KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD. WEST
DIVISION, DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI A.P. SINGH-ADVOCATE )
AND
1. MANAGING DIRECTOR MADHYA PRADESH
POORVA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD.
DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. CHIEF ENGINEER MADHYA PRADESH POORV
KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LIMITED
REWA DIVISION DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
3. SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER MADHYA
PRADESH POORV KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN
COMPANY LIMITED REWA DIVISION DISTRICT
REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI ANOOP NAIR- ADVOCATE )
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the
following:
ORDER
This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging the transfer order dated 15.09.2022 passed by the respondent no.1 whereby the petitioner has been transferred to Chhindwara from Rewa on Signature Not Verified Signed by: VARSHA DUBEY Signing time: 10/18/2022 6:33:11 PM
administrative ground.
Only ground raised by the counsel for the applicant is that he is going to be retired on 31.08.2023 and less than a year's time is remaining for his superannuation. In terms of the policy of the State Government, an employee who is at the verge of retirement, should not normally be transferred. Counsel has also placed reliance on the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Ramniwas Sharma Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (W.P.No.7901 of 2022) dated 06.04.2022, in which, in similar circumstances, an interim relief was granted to the petitioner. It is pointed out that a representation has been filed by the petitioner before the respondent No.1, which is pending consideration and
has not been decided till date. An innocuous prayer is made to direct the respondent no.1 to consider and decide the pending representation and till then petitioner be permitted to continue at the present place of posting.
Counsel for the respondent opposes the prayer stating that the transfer of the petitioner is on administrative ground but he does not dispute the fact that the date of the retirement of the petitioner is 31.08.2023.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the settled proposition of law as well as policy of Government, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 1 to dwell upon the representation and pass a self contained speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and communicate the outcome to the petitioner.
Till decision on the representation, the petitioner is permitted to continue at the present place of posting, i.e. Rewa.
Needless to mention that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: VARSHA DUBEY Signing time: 10/18/2022 6:33:11 PM
Accordingly, the petition is disposed off. Certified copy as per rules.
(VISHAL MISHRA) JUDGE VD
Signature Not Verified Signed by: VARSHA DUBEY Signing time: 10/18/2022 6:33:11 PM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!