Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Swapnil Rajput vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2022 Latest Caselaw 13323 MP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13323 MP
Judgement Date : 11 October, 2022

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Swapnil Rajput vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 October, 2022
Author: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia
                                                            1
                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT GWALIOR
                                                          BEFORE
                                       HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
                                                   ON THE 11th OF OCTOBER, 2022

                                              WRIT PETITION No. 22499 of 2022

                                   BETWEEN:-
                                   SWAPNIL RAJPUT S/O SHRI RAMAVTAR
                                   RAJPUT, AGE 23 YEARS, OCCUPATION SERVICE,
                                   R/O TOPPERS PUBLIC SCHOOL NEAR P.G.
                                   COLLEGE, MAHARAJPUR ROAD, PS CIVIL
                                   LINES,   DISTRICT     MORENA    (MADHYA
                                   PRADESH)

                                                                                          .....PETITIONER
                                   (SHRI S.N.SETH- ADVOCATE)

                                   AND
                          1.       STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
                                   PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
                                   HOME, MANTRALAYA, VALLABH BHAWAN,
                                   BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          2.       THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE
                                   HEADQUARTER,   JAHANGIRABAD    BHOPAL
                                   (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          3.       THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF
                                   P O L I C E , POLICE (SELECTION) PHQ
                                   JAHANGIRABAD BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          4.       THE COMMANDANT 26TH BN SAF, GUNA GUNA
                                   (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                       .....RESPONDENTS
                                   (SHRI A.K.NIRANKARI- GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

                                Th is petition coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the
                          following:
                                                             ORDER

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-

Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRINCEE BARAIYA Signing time: 12-Oct-22 10:58:30 AM

I) To call for the relevant record;

II) To quash merit list which relates to the petitioner and further be pleased to direct the respondents to issue a fresh merit list by considering the preference given by the petitioner within the respective category and allot the post and seat as per preference given in application.

III) To direct the respondents 2 & 3 to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner in the light of the order passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Praveen Kumar Kurmi (Supra) Vs. State of MP passed in civil appeal no.7663/21; IV) To direct the respondents to give all consequential benefits seniority and pay protection similarly to order passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Praveen Kumar Kurmi (Supra);

V) Cost may also be ordered;

VI) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may kindly be deem fit may kindly be granted.

It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the case in hand is duly covered by order dated 12/09/2022 passed by this Court in the case of Deependra Kumar and Others Vs. State of M.P. and Others in W.P.No.8534/2022 and this case may also be disposed of in the terms and conditions of the said order.

The submission made by the counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the counsel for the State but fairly conceded that the case in hand is duly covered by judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Praveen Kumar Kurmi vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others decided on 24th February, 2022 in Civil Appeal No. 7663/2021.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties. In the case of Deependra Kumar (supra) the following order has been passed:-

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRINCEE BARAIYA Signing time: 12-Oct-22 10:58:30 AM

been filed seeking following reliefs :

I. to call for the relevant record.

II. to quash the merit list its relates with the petitioners and further be pleased to direct the respondents to issue a fresh merit list by considering the preference given by the petitioners within their respective category and allot the post and seat as per preference given in application. III. To direct the respondents to give appointment to the petitioners in District Force/S.B. with all consequential benefits like seniority and pay protection similarly to order passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Praveen Kumar Kurmi (Supra).

IV. Any other relief together cost of the petition which this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of this case may also be awarded in favour of the petitioner.

It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that the Co-

ordinate Benches of this Court had directed the respondents to decide the representation in the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Praveen Kumar Kurmi vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others decided on 24th February, 2022 in Civil Appeal No. 7663/2021. To buttress his contention, the counsel for the petitioners has also relied upon the order dated 20th June, 2022 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case o f Sandeep Kumar Sahu and Others vs. State of M.P. and Others in WP No. 10926 of 2022 (Principal Seat). Per contra, it is submitted by the counsel for the respondents that as present they don't have any instructions.

Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners may be granted liberty to file a representation for redressal of their grievances and the respondents may be directed to decide their representation in accordance with law.

In view of the innocuous prayer made by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a fresh representation pointing out their grievances and entitlement. In case such a representation is made, then the respondents shall decide the same by passing a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation as well as the Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRINCEE BARAIYA Signing time: 12-Oct-22 10:58:30 AM

certified copy of this order.

It is needless to mention that since this Court has not considered the merits of the case, therefore, the representation shall be decided strictly in accordance with law without getting prejudiced or influenced by this order.

Accordingly, this petition is also disposed of in the terms and conditions of the order passed in the case of Deependra Kumar (supra).

(G.S. AHLUWALIA) JUDGE Pj'S/-

Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRINCEE BARAIYA Signing time: 12-Oct-22 10:58:30 AM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter