Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 15802 MP
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT
ON THE 30 th OF NOVEMBER, 2022
WRIT PETITION No. 27578 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
1. UMAKANT S/O OMPRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 26
YEAR S, OCCUPATION: CONSTABLE (GD) ROLL
NO. 20780700 13TH BATTALION SPECIAL ARMED
FORCE GWALIOR PRESENTLY WORKING AT F
COMPANY CAMP RAJ BHAWAN BHOPAL BHOPAL
M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. ANKUR SINGH S/O ARJUN SINGH RAWAT, AGED
ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCCUPATION: CONSTABLE
(GD) ROLL NO. 20573911 13TH BATTALION
SPECIAL ARMED FORCE GWALIOR PRESENTLY
WORKING AT F COMPANY CAMP RAJ BHAWAN
BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. PRADEEP DUBEY S/O GUDDEY LAL, AGED ABOUT
31 YEARS, OCCUPATION: CONSTABLE (GD) ROLL
NO. 21245244 1ST BATTALION SPECIAL ARMED
FORCE INDORE PRESENTLY WORKING AT 1ST
BATTALION SPECIAL ARMED FORCE INDORE
(MADHYA PRADESH)
4. SUNIL KUMAR MISHRA S/O DVANAND MISHRA,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
CONSTABLE (GD) ROLL NO. 21296536 9TH
BATTALION SPECIAL ARMED FORCE REWA
PRESENTLY WORKING AT 9TH BATTALION
SPECIAL ARMED FORCE REWA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
5. MANOJ S/O VIJAY SINGH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: CONSTABLE (GD) ROLL NO.
20733765 13TH BATTALION SPECIAL ARMED
FORCE GWALIOR PRESENTLY WORKING AT 13TH
BATTALION SPECIAL ARMED FORCE GWALIOR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI N.S. RUPRAH, ADVOCATE)
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: AMITABH
RANJAN
Signing time: 12/2/2022
5:04:40 PM
2
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
THROUGPRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME
DEPARTMENT VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (M.P.)
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE POLICE
H E A D Q U A R T E R S JAHANGIRABAD BHOPAL
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
( S E L E C T I O N ) POLICE HEADQUARTERS
JAHANGIRABAD BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. MADHYA PRADESH EMPLOYEES SELECTION
BOARD (EARLIER KNOWN AS PROFESSIONAL
EXAMINATION BOARD) THROUGH ITS
SECRETARY CHAYAN BAWAN MAIN ROAD NO. 1
CHINAR PARK (EAST) BHOPAL (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3 BY SHRI G.P. SINGH, GOVERNMENT
ADVOCATE )
(RESPONDENT No.4 BY SHRI RAHUL DIWAKAR)
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
Petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the of the Constitution of India making a prayer to direct respondents to consider the case of petitioners for giving them Branch of service for which petitioners have filled up the choice in accordance with their merit list. It is submitted that petitioners may not be deprived from the benefit of choice which has been given to them only on ground that reserve category candidate has been given the Branch of service in which petitioners have given their choice.
Counsel appearing for the petitioners relied upon the judgment dated 24.02.2022 passed in Civil Appeal No. 7663/2021 (Pravin Kumar Kurmi
Signature Not Verified Signed by: AMITABH RANJAN Signing time: 12/2/2022 5:04:40 PM
Vs. State of M.P.) and makes a prayer that respondent authorities be directed to consider and decide representation of petitioners in accordance with order passed by Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 7663/2021.
Govt. Advocate for the State submitted that representation preferred by petitioners shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, writ petition is disposed off directing respondents to consider and decide the representation of petitioner in accordance with order dated 24.02.2022 passed by Hon'ble the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 7663/2022 within a period of 90 days.
At this stage, Government Advocate appearing for State submitted that petition is suffered from delay and latches. Petitioner has been given appointment and order of posting on 2017. They had approached this Court after a long delay. They are working in the branch of service which has been allotted to them since last five years. Respondents will be adversely affected if the respondents are directed to consider representation which has been filed after considerable delay.
Considering aforesaid submissions of Government Advocate, writ petition filed by petitioners is disposed of with directions as given above with a proviso that case of petitioners shall be considered sympathetically and if petitioners can be adjusted according to their choice in branch of service, same
shall be considered and their case may not be rejected only on the ground of delay and order shall be passed in accordance with law.
Certified copy as per rules.
(VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Signed by: AMITABH RANJAN Signing time: 12/2/2022 5:04:40 PM
Amitabh
Signature Not Verified Signed by: AMITABH RANJAN Signing time: 12/2/2022 5:04:40 PM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!