Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6717 MP
Judgement Date : 5 May, 2022
1
CRA No.-735-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH
ON THE 5th OF MAY, 2022
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.735 of 2015
Between:-
Lalaram Sen @ Ramchandra
S/o Sudama Sen, Aged about 19 years,
R/o Parnia, P.S.-Kalinjar, District
Banda (U.P.),
Presently R/o Pramod Van, Near
Mahatma Ghandhi School, P.S.-
Nayagaon, District-Satna (M.P.)
...Appellant
(None for the appellant)
And
The State of Madhya Pradesh,
Through- P.S-Kolgawan, Satna
District-Satna (M.P.)
...Respondent
(By Shri Chandrapal Singh Parmar, Public Prosecutor)
...................................................................................
This appeal coming on for final hearing this day, the court passed
the following:
ORDER
This appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 14.01.2015 passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Satna, District-Satna (M.P.) in Sessions Trial No.52/2013 whereby the appellant stands convicted and sentenced as under:-
Conviction under Section Sentence to undergo
363 of IPC R.I. for 7 fine of indefault-R.I. for
years Rs.3,000/- 1 year
Signature Not Verified
SAN
Digitally signed by ASHISH KUMAR JAIN Date: 2022.05.06 17:52:50 IST
CRA No.-735-2015
365 of IPC R.I. for 7 fine of indefault-R.I. for years Rs.3,000/- 1 year 368 of IPC R.I. for 7 fine of indefault-R.I. for years Rs.3,000/- 1 year 376(2)(i) of IPC R.I. for 10 fine of indefault-R.I. for years Rs.3,000/- 2 years and 6 months 376(2)(n) of IPC R.I. for 10 fine of indefault-R.I. for years Rs.3,000/- 2 years and 6 months 5(L)/6 of Protection from R.I. for 10 fine of Indefault-R.I. for Children from Sexual years Rs.3,000/- 2 years and 6 Offence Act, 2012 months
As per report (No.817/okjaV-1/2022, Satna dated 05.05.2022) received by Shri Chandrapal Singh Parmar, Govt. Advocate/Public Prosecutor from the Superintendent, Central Jail, Satna, the appellant has completed his sentence awarded by the trial Court and has been released from the jail on 03.07.2021, a copy whereof has been brought on record.
No one has appeared to prosecute the appeal on behalf of the appellant.
In the aforesaid circumstances, no useful purpose will be served by entering into the merits of the case. Therefore, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Daya Singh Lohariya Vs. State of Rajasthan; (2007) 5 SCC 366 and by the Jharkhand High Court in the case of Sarula Munda Vs. State of Bihar; 2011 (3) Cr.L.J. 3639, this appeal is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the Jail Authorities as well as to the concerned trial Court for information and necessary action.
(Virender Singh) Judge
@shish
Signature Not Verified SAN
Digitally signed by ASHISH KUMAR JAIN Date: 2022.05.06 17:52:50 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!