Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6715 MP
Judgement Date : 5 May, 2022
1
CRA No.-695-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH
ON THE 5th OF MAY, 2022
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.695 of 2015
Between:-
Haribabu Mongiya @ Durgesh
S/o Halkeveer Mongiya, Aged about
20 years, R/o Lohiya Ward, Near Kali
Mandir, Pipariya, District
Hoshangabad (M.P.)
...Appellant
(None for the appellant)
And
The State of Madhya Pradesh,
Through- P.S-Pipariya, Hoshangabad
District-Hoshangabad (M.P.)
...Respondent
(By Shri Chandrapal Singh Parmar, Public Prosecutor)
...................................................................................
This appeal coming on for final hearing this day, the court
passed the following:
ORDER
This appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 30.10.2014 passed by IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Pipariya, Hosangabad, District-Hosangabad (M.P.) in Sessions Trial No.146/2014 whereby the appellant stands convicted and sentenced as under:-
Conviction under Section Sentence to undergo 363 of IPC R.I. for fine of indefault-R.I.
3 years Rs.1,000/- for 1 month Signature Not Verified SAN
Digitally signed by ASHISH KUMAR JAIN Date: 2022.05.07 18:07:07 IST
CRA No.-695-2015
366A of IPC R.I. for fine of indefault-R.I.
10 years Rs.2,000/- for 3 months
376 of IPC R.I. for fine of indefault-R.I.
10 years Rs.2,000/- for 3 months
4 of Protection of Children R.I. for fine of indefault-R.I.
from Sexual Offence Act 10 years Rs.2,000/- for 3 months All the sentences shall run concurrently. As per report (No.922/okjaV/2022) of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Narmadapuram and report (No.1242/okjaV/2022) of the Superintendent, District Jail, Sehore, received by Shri Chandrapal Singh Parmar, Govt. Advocate/Public Prosecutor, the appellant has completed his sentence awarded by the trial Court in Sessions Trial No.146/2014, however he is serving out the sentence in connection with Crime No.395/2013, copies whereof have been brought on record.
No one has appeared to prosecute the appeal on behalf of the appellant.
In the aforesaid circumstances, no useful purpose will be served by entering into the merits of the case. Therefore, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Daya Singh Lohariya Vs. State of Rajasthan; (2007) 5 SCC 366 and by the Jharkhand High Court in the case of Sarula Munda Vs. State of Bihar; 2011 (3) Cr.L.J. 3639, this appeal is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the Jail Authorities as well as to the concerned trial Court for information and necessary action.
(Virender Singh) Judge
@shish
Signature Not Verified SAN
Digitally signed by ASHISH KUMAR JAIN Date: 2022.05.07 18:07:07 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!