Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4411 MP
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2022
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No. 15256/2022 (RITESH GORE Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
Gwalior, Dated : 29/03/2022
Shri Ashish Singh Jadon, Counsel for applicant.
Shri A.K. Nirankari, Counsel for State.
Case diary is available.
This first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been
filed for grant of bail.
The applicant has been arrested on 03.02.2022 in connection
with Crime No.86/2022 registered at Police Station - Cantt, District
Guna for offence under Section 34 (2) of Excise Act.
It is submitted by the Counsel for the applicant that according
to the prosecution case, 60 liters of illicit liquor has been seized from
the possession of the applicant. It is submitted that applicant has been
falsely implicated. He is in jail from 03.02.2022 i.e. more than one
and a half months. In view of the criminal antecedents, applicant is
ready and willing to abide by any stringent condition which may be
imposed by the Court including that of furnishing cash surety. The
Trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there is no possibility
of his absconding or tampering with the prosecution case
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by Counsel
for the State. It is submitted that applicant has criminal history and six
criminal cases have been registered against him including one private
complaint. It is submitted that one offence was registered under
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No. 15256/2022 (RITESH GORE Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
Section 307 of IPC, whereas second offence was registered under
Section 354-D, 294, 323 of IPC and third offence was registered
under section 354, 365 and 294 of IPC and fourth was registered
under Section 294, 323, 506 of IPC and all the four trials are pending
whereas he has been convicted under the Public Gambling Act.
Considering the antecedents of applicant, this Court is of the
view that he can be granted bail only on the stringent condition of
furnishing cash surety.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and
without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is
allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on
furnishing cash surety of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lac Fifty
Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal
Court to appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned
Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of trial but in case
of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
It is made clear that single default in appearance before the
Trial Court, or in case of registration of new offence, this bail order
shall automatically come to an end and the cash surety so furnished
by the applicant shall automatically stand forfeited without any
reference to the Court.
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No. 15256/2022 (RITESH GORE Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the
case of Aparna Bhat & Ors. vs. State of M.P. passed on 18/3/2021
in Criminal Appeal No.329/2021, the intimation regarding grant of
bail be sent to the complainant.
Certified copy as per rules.
(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge Aman AMAN TIWARI 2022.03.29 17:20:45 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!