Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ms. Rashmi Dhanak vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2022 Latest Caselaw 4242 MP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4242 MP
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2022

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Ms. Rashmi Dhanak vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 March, 2022
Author: Vijay Kumar Shukla
                                                                                 1
                                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                                        AT INDORE
                                                                              BEFORE
                                                             HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
                                                                       ON THE 26th OF MARCH, 2022

                                                                 WRIT PETITION No. 28825 of 2021

                                                     Between:-
                                                     MS. RASHMI DHANAK D/O LATE SHRI BABULAL
                                                     DHANAK , AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
                                                     UNEMPLOYED 19, NEW ABHISHEK NAGAR
                                                     (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                                                .....PETITIONER
                                                     (BY SHRI L.C. PATNE - ADVOCATE)

                                                     AND

                                            1.       THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL
                                                     SECRETARY   VALLABH  BHAWAN   BHOPAL
                                                     (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                            2.       DISTRICT ORGANISER     TRIBAL  WELFARE
                                                     DEPARTMENT UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                                             .....RESPONDENTS
                                                     (BY SHRI MANISH NAIR - DY. ADVOCATE GENERAL)

                                                  T h is petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the
                                            following:
                                                                                  ORDER

With the consent of learned counsel for parties, the matter is finally heard. In the instant petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 17/06/2019 passed by the respondent No.2 by which the application filed by the petitioner was rejected on the basis of Clause 2.4 of the Compassionate Appointment Scheme dated 29/9/2014.

Counsel for petitioner submits that Clause 2.2 of the Policy 2014 is contrary to law held by the Division Bench of this Court in WA No.756/2019 (Meenakshi Dubey Vs. M.P. Poorva Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd & Ors.) . This Court after considering the same policy held that Clause 2.2 of the Policy so far it deprives a married daughter from consideration for compassionate appointment is violative of the provisions of Article 14, 16 and 39(a) of the Constitution of India. Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by SAN SOUMYA RANJAN DALAI Date: 2022.03.26 A women citizen cannot be excluded for any appointment on compassionate basis 17:04:45 IST

on the ground of sex alone. It was further held that the daughter even after marriage

remains part of the family and she could not be treated as not belonging to her father's family.

Counsel for State could not dispute the same that the issue raised in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgment of Meenakshi Dubey (supra).

In view of the aforesaid, the impugned order dated 17/06/2019 rejecting the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment is quashed and the respondent No.2 is directed to reconsider the case of the petitioner on merit for compassionate appointment in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of communication of the order.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed and disposed of

(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE soumya

Signature Not Verified VerifiedDigitally Digitally signed by SAN SOUMYA RANJAN DALAI Date: 2022.03.26 17:04:45 IST

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter