Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3796 MP
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2022
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC No.12559/2022
(VISHAL VS. STATE OF M.P.)
Gwalior, Dated : 16/03/2022
Shri S.S.Rajput, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Naval Gupta, learned counsel for the State.
Case diary is available.
In compliance of the order dated 14/03/2022, the
Superintendent of Police, Guna has filed his affidavit but the contents
of the affidavit are also shocking.
Paragraph 10 and 13 of the affidavit reads as under:-
"10. That, upon the aforesaid information, the
I.O. Informed the complainant to come near the bridge
for identification of the alleged accused persons.
Thereafter, the aforesaid doubtful persons, who were
sitting near the bridge, were encircled and the
complainant identified them.
13. That, it is also most respectfully submitted
that, the Test Identification Parade (TIP) of the
accused persons would be conducted by the brother of
complainant before filing of the charge sheet in
accordance with law."
The police authorities must realize that holding the Test
Identification Parade at the earliest is necessary. A very vague reply
has been given that the TIP would be conducted by the brother of the
complainant before filing of the charge-sheet. Thus, it is clear that the
police is not interested in conducting the TIP of the applicant.
Be that whatever it may be.
The manner in which affidavit has been filed, it clearly
indicates that either the police has prepared a false case against the
2
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC No.12559/2022
(VISHAL VS. STATE OF M.P.)
applicant with a malafide intention or even the police authorities do
not know the law.
Be that whatever it may.
For the above mentioned circumstances, this Court cannot keep
the applicant in jail for indefinite period.
This first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been
filed for grant of bail.
The applicant has been arrested on 18/02/2022 in connection
with Crime No.103/2022 registered at Police Station Kotwali,
District Guna for offence under Sections 294, 327, 506, 427, 148 and
149 of IPC.
According to the prosecution case, the complainant had some
dispute with the owner Nanakhedi Petrol Pump and the complainant
and on the said issue, some unknown persons came to the house of
the complainant and started abusing him and also demanded money
for purchasing the liquor. When it was refused by the complainant
Rahul then one person threw stone causing injury on the hand of
Rahul. The other accused persons were having lathi, danda and farsa
and, accordingly, gate of the house as well as Alto car parked outside
the house was damaged. All the co-accused persons threatened Rahul
that in case, if FIR is lodged, then he would be killed. When
neighbour Nandkishore Bhargava tried to intervene in the matter,
3
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC No.12559/2022
(VISHAL VS. STATE OF M.P.)
then glasses of Venue car were also broken. It is submitted that
although the applicant is in jail from 18/02/2022, but no Test
Identification Parade has been conducted.
The name of the applicant is neither mentioned in the FIR nor
in 161 of Cr.P.C. statements of any of the witnesses. The police is not
interested in holding the TIP. Accordingly, it is submitted that further
custody of the applicant is unwarranted and he may be granted bail.
The Trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there is no
possibility of his absconding or tampering with the prosecution case.
Per contra, the application is opposed by the counsel for the
respondent/State. It is submitted that the applicant has a criminal
history and 10 more criminal cases have been registered against him
but the State counsel fails to explain that on what basis the applicant
has been taken into custody specifically when his identity has not
been disclosed at any stage of investigation and the police is also not
interested in holing the TIP. However, it is submitted that there is
nothing in the case diary to show that the accused was identified to
complainant. It appears that the police is not interested in holding the
TIP of the applicant at the earliest.
In view of the contention of the counsel for the State that the
diary does not contain any document to show that the applicant was
identified by complainant, it is clear that the Superintendent of
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.12559/2022 (VISHAL VS. STATE OF M.P.)
Police, Guna has also filed his affidavit in a most casual manner even
without looking at the diary.
Considering the period of detention as well as considering the
facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the
merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is directed that the
applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the
sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac) with one surety in the like
amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court to
appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of trial but in case
of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in
the case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on
18.03.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation
regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.
Let a copy of this order be forwarded to the Director General
of Police, State of M.P. for necessary information.
Certified copy as per rules.
(G.S. Ahluwalia)
Pj'S/- Judge
Digitally signed by
PRINCEE BARAIYA
Date: 2022.03.16
17:07:15 -07'00'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!