Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3441 MP
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2022
1
The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
WP No. 5659 of 2022
(DEVENDRA SINGH Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS)
Gwalior, Dated : 10-03-2022
Shri Nitin Agarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri MPS Raghuvanshi, learned Additional Advocate General and Shri Vijay
Sundaram, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State.
In the light of the judgment of the Coordinate Bench in the batch of writ petitions, lead case being W.P. No.9971 of 2021 order dated 3rd August, 2021, there is no cavil of doubt that the controversy involved in the writ petition is
squarely covered. As a consequence thereof, for want of authority and jurisdiction, the Mining Officer has misdirected himself while adhering to the provisions of Rule 53 (2) and (3) of M.P. Minor Mineral Rules, 1996 after the same has been repealed by the Rules known as M.P. Sand (Mining, Transportation, Storage and Trading) Rules, 2019 (`2019 Sand Rules' for brevity). Hence, the impugned order suffers from patent illegality and therefore, cannot be sustained in the eyes of law.
Accordingly, the order impugned is quashed and the writ petition is allowed. However, it is considered apposite to observe that the Mining Officer shall be at liberty to proceed against the petitioner under Rule 20 (2) of `2019 Sand Rules' in
accordance with law and the prayer for release of vehicle shall be considered in accordance with law.
Certified copy as per rules.
(ANAND PATHAK) (SATISH KUMAR SHARMA)
JUDGE JUDGE
Anil*
ANIL KUMAR
CHAURASIYA
2022.03.11
09:13:37
-08'00'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!