Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3397 MP
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT
ON THE 10th OF MARCH, 2022
CONTEMPT PETITION CIVIL No. 2201 of 2017
Between:-
OMPRAKASH MARWAHA S/O SHRI K.N.
MARWAHA , AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: FIELD ASSISTANT PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT J/8, TEJ APARTMENT ADARSH
NAGAR NARMADA ROAD TEHSIL AND DISTRICT
JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(NONE)
AND
1. SHRI PRAMOD AGRAWAL THE PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. DINESH KUMAR KAURAV THE EXECUTIVE
ENGINEER BRIDGE PUBLIC WORKS
D EPARTM EN T DIVISION JABALPUR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY ASHISH ANAND BARNARD, ADVOCATE & MR. LOKESH JAIN)
This petition has come up for hearing on this day. The court passed the
following:
ORDER
Proxy counsel appearing for petitioner makes a prayer that matter may be adjourned.
On going through Vakalatnama , it is found that Vakalatnama has been signed by three advocates. If one counsel is not appearing, then other two counsel can appear and argue the case. In view of same request made by proxy counsel is diclined.
Petitioner has filed this petition making a prayer to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent for non-compliance of Court order dated 05.07.2016.
In W.P.No.13125/2015, this Court issued following directions :
Signature SAN Not Verified "However, learned Panel Lawyer contends that the State indents to test the Digitally signed by legality and validity of the order passed by Division Bench (supra) before Hon'ble the NEETI TIWARI Date: 2022.03.11 17:36:35 IST
Apex Court. Admittedly, as on date, no such proceedings are pending before the Apex Court and hence this Court is bound by the judgment rendered by the Division Bench. Accordingly petitioner is held entitled for the benefits flowing from the judgment rendered in the case of Tejulal Yadav (supra) and the mandates contained therein shall apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis."
In reply, compliance report has been filed by respondent. It has been stated therein that petitioner has relied on circular of State Govt. dated 21.09.2016 and on
basis of said circular, he may be granted 1 st, 2nd & 3rd Time Scale of Pay. In compliance of order passed by this Court, petitioner has been granted benefit of
2nd Time Pay Scale w.e.f. 01.01.2016 & 3 rd Time Pay Scale from 02.03.2016. In view of same, it is submitted that order passed by this Court has been complied with.
Considering facts and circumstances of the case, contempt petition is disposed off with liberty to petitioner to file fresh writ petition, if he has some remaining grievances in the matter.
(VISHAL DHAGAT)
JUDGE
nd
Signature
SAN Not
Verified
Digitally signed by
NEETI TIWARI
Date: 2022.03.11
17:36:35 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!