Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dinesh Kumar Chouhan vs Medical Education Department
2022 Latest Caselaw 3373 MP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3373 MP
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2022

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Dinesh Kumar Chouhan vs Medical Education Department on 10 March, 2022
Author: Chief Justice
                                                                         1
                                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
                                                                          BEFORE
                                                           HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,
                                                                       CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                                             &
                                                         HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
                                                                 ON THE 10th OF MARCH, 2022

                                                               WRIT APPEAL No. 523 of 2020

                                                   Between:-
                                                   DINESH KUMAR CHOUHAN S/O SHRI A.R.
                                                   CHOUHAN,    AGED  ABOUT    34    YEARS,
                                                   OCCUPATION: ADVOCATE R/o M-5, 6 INDORE
                                                   TRADE CENTRE NEAR MADHUMILAN SQUARE
                                                   INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                                 .....APPELLANT
                                                   (BY SHRI MANOJ MANAV - ADVOCATE)

                                                   AND

                                            1.     STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH,
                                                   THROUGH - PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MEDICAL
                                                   EDUCATION     DEPARTMENT,     VALLABH
                                                   BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                            2.     DIRECTOR,      MEDICAL     EDUCATION
                                                   DEPARTM ENT, SATPURA BHAVAN , BHOPAL
                                                   (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                            3.     COMMISSIONER,    MEDICAL   EDUCATION
                                                   DEPARTMENT 6TH FLOOR SATPURA BHAVAN ,
                                                   BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                            4.     STATE  PUBLIC    INFORMATION      OFFICER
                                                   SUCHNA BHAVAN, 35-B, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL
                                                   (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                            5.     COM M ISSIONER INDORE DIVISION INDORE,
                                                   (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                            6.     GOVT. DENTAL COLLEGE , INDORE THROUGH
                                                   ITS PRINCIPAL DENTAL COLLEGE PREMISES,
Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by
  SAN                 SMT MUKTA
                      KOUSHAL
                                                   INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)
                      Date: 2022.03.12
                      14:43:38 IST


                                                                                               .....RESPONDENTS
                                                   (SHRI S.R.SAXENA - DEPUTY ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR
                                                                           2
                                                    RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 3, 5 AND 6 )
                                                    (SHRI SHASHWAT SETH - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT No.4)

                                                  This appeal coming on for orders this day, Hon'ble Shri Vijay Kumar
                                            Shukla, Judge passed the following:
                                                                                ORDER

This present Writ Appeal is filed under section 2 of M.P. Uchcha Nayaylaya (Khandnyaya Peeth Ko Appeal Adhiniyam), 2005 being aggrieved by the order dated 12.12.2019 passed by learned Single Judge whereby the writ petition filed by appellant has been dismissed.

The appellant has filed writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 22.10.2018 passed by the respondent No.4-

State Public Information Officer.

Facts of the case in short are that the petitioner filed an application under section 6(1) of Right to Information Act, 2005 (in short 'the Act') for obtaining information from Government Dental College, Indore in respect of appointment of Lecturer in Prosthodentics branch. Petitioner has demanded the marks list of candidate, selection list and the marks granted to the participants in different heads, however no information has been provided to the petitioner within the stipulated period of 30 days. He has therefore, filed an appeal before the first appellate authority i.e. Commissioner, Medical Education Department, Bhopal along with requisite documents and stamps. After receiving the first appeal, respondent No.3 has denied to supply such information to the petitioner. After rejection of the first appeal, petitioner approached to the State Public Information Officer-respondent No.2 but respondent No.2 has also denied the supply of aforesaid information on the ground of provisions of Section 8(J) of Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by SAN SMT MUKTA

the Act of 2005. The respondents have supplied the list of selected candidates KOUSHAL Date: 2022.03.12 14:43:38 IST

and further selection list was provided to the petitioner where the name of Mrs.

Akansha Maheshwari was mentioned and that is a separate list and other three questions were denied on the ground that these are the personal informations so it is exempted to supply under the Act. Being aggrieved by the said order, petitioner filed the writ petition.

Counsel for the appellant submits that petitioner being citizen of India is entitled to get information regarding the appointment made on the said post. It is submitted that persons who are holding the public post and are accountable to the public at large and therefore, they cannot deny supply of public documents. It is further submitted that no personal information was demanded by the petitioner and there is no bar applicable under the Act of 2005 in respect of any information which relates to public activities or interest.

The respondents have filed the reply and in the reply, they have raised an objection that present petition seems to be a sponsored petition as the petitioner has nothing to do with the posts in question so also the petitioner is also not one of the participant/candidate in which the petitioner alleged to be objected and therefore, the petitioner does not have any locus to seek third party information in regard to any of the participant. It is further submitted that petition deserves to be dismissed for want of non-joinder of necessary party. The information sought by petitioner shows that, it is purely a case of service matter and if one of them is aggrieved, then the candidate will have a remedy to

file service petition before the proper forum and present petition seems to be an attempt to make pressure on the authorities. Respondents have relied on the order passed by the apex Court in the case of R.K.Jain Vs. Union of Indian

Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by and others passed in SLP (C) No.22609/2012 as well as Girish SAN SMT MUKTA KOUSHAL Date: 2022.03.12 14:43:38 IST Ramchandra Vs. C.I.Commissioner reported in (2013) 1 SCC 212.

The learned Single Judge has considered rival contentions raised on

behalf of the parties and held that as per the judgment in the case of R.K.Jain (supra) in paragraph No.12 of the said order it has been held that there shall be no obligation to give any citizen information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship of any public activity or interest or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy. Thus, the information sought by the petitioner has no relationship to any public activity or interest. Similar view has been taken in the case of Girish Ramchandra (supra). In view of aforesaid, we do not find any illegality in the order passed by learned Single Judge warranting any interference in present intra court appeal.

Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed.

No order as to costs.

                                                  (RAVI MALIMATH)                                 (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)
                                                    CHIEF JUSTICE                                         JUDGE
                                             MK




Signature Not Verified
              VerifiedDigitally
                       Digitally signed by
  SAN                  SMT MUKTA
                       KOUSHAL
                       Date: 2022.03.12
                       14:43:38 IST
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter