Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3174 MP
Judgement Date : 7 March, 2022
1
The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
WP No. 5668 of 2022
(DR. MOHITA PANDEY Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS)
Jabalpur, Dated : 07-03-2022
Shri Siddharth Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Siddharth Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the
respondent/State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that action of respondents in shifting the reserve category post of one compartment (in-service) to another (General open/direct) is bad in law and runs contrary to Constitution Bench
judgment of Supreme Court in Tamil Nadu Medical Officers Association and others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Anr [(2021) 6 SCC 568] and judgments in K. Duraisamy and Another Vs. State of T.N. and others [(2001) 2 SCC 538: AIR 2001 SCW448], State of M.P. and Ors Vs. Gopal D. Tirthani and Ors. [(2003) 7 SCC 83 : AIR 2003 SC 2952] and Sunita Sharma Vs. State of M.P. and Ors. [2001(2) MPLJ 524 : 2001 (5) MPHT 276].
Learned Government Advocate for the respondent/State is directed to seek instructions.
List the matter on 10.3.2022.
Till the next date of hearing, the registration of petitioner shall not be cancelled.
This provisional order shall not create any equity or right in favour of the petitioner.
Petitioner may cure the defects as pointed out by the Registry in the meantime.
C.C. today.
(SUJOY PAUL) (DWARKA DHISH BANSAL)
JUDGE JUDGE
ahd
Signature Not Verified
SAN
Digitally signed by MOHD AHMAD
Date: 2022.03.07 17:15:16 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!