Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8938 MP
Judgement Date : 5 July, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT
ON THE 5th OF JULY, 2022
WRIT PETITION No. 14235 of 2022
Between:-
1. SOMJI SINGH S/O SHRI CHIKKU SINGH , AGED
ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETIRED
HEAD MASTER GOVERNMENT PRIMARY
SCHOOL GHISIBAGLA TEHSIL- SHAHPUR,
DISTRICT- BETUL, M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. RAMRAO S/O SADASHIV SURYAVANSHI , AGED
ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETIRED
UPPER DIVISION TEACHER GOVT. HIGHER
SECONDARY MIDDLE SCHOOL CHILKAPUR
TEHSIL BHAINSDEHI DISTRICT BETUL M.P.
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI JITENDRA ARYA, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH TRIBAL
WELFARE DEVELOPMENT THROUGH THE
SECRETARY VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL M.P.
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT THROUGH
SECRETARY VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL M.P.
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TRIBAL
WELFARE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BETUL DISTRICT BETUL M.P. (MADHYA
PRADESH)
4. BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER SCHOOL
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SHAHPUR
DISTRICT BETUL M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
Signature Not
SAN
Verified 5. BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER SCHOOL
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT BHAINSDEHI
Digitally signed by DISTRICT BETUL M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
ARVIND KUMAR
DUBEY
Date: 2022.07.05
17:01:58 IST
2
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI YASH SONI, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
Th is petition coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
Petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India making a prayer that petitioners are entitled for regular pay scale from the initial date of appointment.
Counsel for the petitioners relied on the judgment reported in Usha Ranawat Vs. State of M.P. and others passed in Writ Appeal No. 346/2008 dated 18.12.2008. It is submitted that respondents may be directed to consider
and decide representation of petitioners in accordance with law.
Government Advocate appearing for the State submitted that there is delay in filing of the writ petition, therefore, petitioners may not be given benefit and petition may be dismissed.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioners are having recurring cause of action, however, there is delay on their part in approaching the Court.
In view of same, respondents are directed to consider representation of petitioners for granting benefit of regular pay scale from the date of their initial appointment. However, petitioners will only be entitled for arrears for period of last three years from date of filing of petition if petitioners are found fit for said benefit. Fresh representation will be filed by the petitioners within a period of seven days which shall be considered and decided by the respondents within further period of 90 days.
Signature SAN Not Verified
No opinion is expressed on the merits of the case. Digitally signed by ARVIND KUMAR DUBEY With the aforesaid direction, Writ Petition is disposed off. Date: 2022.07.05 17:01:58 IST
(VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE DUBEY/-
Signature SAN Not Verified Digitally signed by ARVIND KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2022.07.05 17:01:58 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!