Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 918 MP
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2022
1
The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
Cr.A.No. 1374 of 2021
(RAJESH TRIPATHI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS)
Gwalior, Dated: 19/01/2022
Heard through Video Conferencing.
Shri Alok Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the appellants.
Shri Kuldeep Singh, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.
I.A. No.24099/2021, an application for urgent hearing, is taken
up, considered and allowed for the reasons mentioned therein.
The appeal being arguable is admitted for final hearing.
Record of the Court below be called, if not called.
I.A. No.23810/2021, second repeat application under Section 389
(1) of CrPC for suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail to the
appellant No.2-Smt. Seema Tripathi @ Kanti Devi, is taken up and
considered.
This criminal appeal assails the judgment dated 19/02/2021
passed in ST No.27/2014 by First Additional District and Sessions
Judge, Gohad, district Bhind (M.P.), whereby appellant No.2 -Smt.
Seema Tripathi have been convicted as under :-
Sections Imprisonment Fine
419/34 of IPC 3 years' R.I. Rs.1000/-each with default
stipulation.
420/34 of IPC 7 years R.I. Rs.2000/- each with default
stipulation
471/468 of IPC 7 years R.I. Rs.2000/- each with default
stipulation
It is submitted by the appellant No.2 Smt. Seema Tripathi @
The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh Cr.A.No. 1374 of 2021 (RAJESH TRIPATHI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS)
Kanti Devi in her application for suspension of jail sentence that the
trial Court has erred in passing the impugned judgment of conviction
and sentence contrary to law. This is the second application for
suspension of sentence on behalf of the appelllant. Earlier the
appellant was granted interim suspension of sentence for a period of
90 days by the Coordinate Bench of this Court and she has not misued
the liberty so granted to her. It is further submitted that the appellant is
in custody more than two years. The allegation against the appellant is
of getting job in place of complainant. There are lots of contradictions
and omissions in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses. Final
hearing of this appeal shall take considerably long time. Therefore,
considering the period of sentence, learned counsel of the appellant
prays to suspend the jail sentence of the appellant No.02.
Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the submissions
and prayed to reject the application for suspension of sentence.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
documents available on record.
Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the
parties along with facts and circumstances of the case as well as
considering the period of custody suffered by appellant, without
commenting on merits of the case, I.A. No.23810/2021 is hereby
allowed. Subject to depositing of fine amount, if not already
The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh Cr.A.No. 1374 of 2021 (RAJESH TRIPATHI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS)
deposited, and on furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees
One Lakh only) with one solvent surety each of the like amount to
the satisfaction of the concerned Court, the remaining jail sentence of
appellant No.2 Smt. Seema Tripathi @ Kanti Devi shall remain
suspended and she be released on bail. The appellant is further
directed to mark her appearance before the Office of this Court on
11/04/2022 and on subsequent dates given by the Office in this regard,
till final disposal of this appeal.
List the case for final hearing in due course.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the Court below concerned
for information.
Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.
(Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava) Judge
vpn VIPIN KUMAR AGRAHARI 2022.01.20 19:23:15 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!