Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kutiya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2022 Latest Caselaw 627 MP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 627 MP
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2022

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Kutiya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 January, 2022
Author: Vivek Rusia
                                     -: 1 :-
                                                                CRA. No. 720/2012


 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE
  [DIVISION BENCH: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA
AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)]

                               CRA. No. 720/2012
                  (Kutiya S/o. Bhurchand V/s. State of M.P.)
Date : 13.01.2022 :
      Shri Nitin Vyas, learned counsel for the appellant.
      Shri Sudhanshu Vyas, learned counsel for the respondent/State.

Heard on I.A. No.22188/2021, first application u/s. 389 of the Cr.P.C. for suspension of custodial sentence. Vide judgment dated 22.3.2012 passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Jobat in S.T. No.158/2010, the appellant has been convicted u/s. 302 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment.

As per prosecution story, on 28.5.2010 near about at 8 pm., PW-6 Mukesh lodged the FIR in Police Station Kathhiwada that in the evening he along with his brother and father went to attend the marriage in the house of Premsingh. In the marriage, while dancing, his father had a dispute with the present appellant and immediately, they all left the place. While returning to their house, the appellant came with 'Bhala' (a sharp iron object) in his hand and caused the fatal injury to his father due to which he fell down. Thereafter, other accused came there and started pelting stones, due to which he died. After appreciating the evidence came on record, learned Addl. Sessions Judge has convicted the present appellant, as aforesaid, but acquitted all other accused.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is in jail since last more than 10 years. The dispute arose suddenly during the marriage ceremony. There was no previous enmity or pre-meditation to commit the offence. This is a case of single blow and at the most the offence will not travel more than Section 304 Part I or Part II and for which, the appellant has already undergone the sentence. There is no likelihood of early hearing of this appeal in near future. He, therefore, prayed for grant of bail to the appellant.

CRA. No. 720/2012

On the other hand, learned Panel Advocate appearing for the respondent/State opposes the prayer by submitting that the dispute arose during marriage ceremony. After the dispute, the deceased and his sons had left the place but later on the appellant came with 'Bhala' and gave a blow with an intention to kill him. Therefore, the appellant has rightly been convicted u/s. 302 of the IPC and the application is liable to be rejected.

In view of the aforesaid, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, we are of the opinion that the appellant deserves to be released on bail.

Accordingly, the application (I.A. No.22188/2021) is allowed and it is directed that upon furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the Registry of this Court, the execution of custodial part of the sentence shall remain suspended till the final disposal of this appeal. The appellant after being released on bail shall mark his presence before the Registry of this Court on 20.09.2022 and on all such subsequent dates, as may be fixed in this behalf by the Registry during the pendency of this appeal.

Before releasing the appellant from the custody, the Jail Authorities are directed to medically examine him in order to rule out the possibility of COVID-19 infection and shall comply with the direction given by the Apex Court in Writ Petition No.01/2020.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

         [ VIVEK RUSIA ]                                             [RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)]
             JUDGE.                                                           JUDGE.
Alok/-
           ALOK
                              Digitally signed by ALOK GARGAV

DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH INDORE, ou=JUDICIAL, postalCode=452001, st=Madhya Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=eae18b7018e4245a54c74948bb27999d7e05252686406 5b20b27a5804a3e1fea,

GARGAV pseudonym=7CDEDE27CC58A5C0E24DE6046DC50DE017D631F 3, serialNumber=9995A79B765CF420033A1CBAAFF5461F718D618 BA2FDCA70E412F27FFE6E8CB0, cn=ALOK GARGAV Date: 2022.01.17 14:29:32 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter