Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 339 MP
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2022
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC No.64086/2021
Golu @ Nitesh vs. State of M.P.
Gwalior, Dated : 06/01/2022
Shri Ashutosh Pandey, Counsel for the applicant.
Shri A.P.S. Tomar, Panel Lawyer for the State.
Case diary is available.
This first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been filed
for grant of bail.
The applicant has been arrested on 30.11.2021 in connection
with Crime No.179/2021 registered at Police Station Shahar Basoda,
District Vidisha for offence under Sections 327, 294, 323, 506, 34 of
IPC.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that according to
the prosecution case, the applicant went to the Dhaba and demanded
money from the complainant for purchasing liquor and when he
refused to do so, then he was abused. The applicant picked up Danda
lying on the spot and assaulted on the head of the injured. It is further
alleged that an amount of Rs.2,000/- which was kept in the shop of the
complainant was taken away. While fleeing away, they also extended a
threat that in future also the complainant must give money for
purchasing liquor. It is submitted that the allegations are false. Further
the applicant is in jail from 30.11.2021. The trial is likely to take
sufficiently long time and there is no possibility of his absconding or
tampering with the prosecution case. It is further submitted that in
view of the criminal antecedents of the applicant, he is ready and
2
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC No.64086/2021
Golu @ Nitesh vs. State of M.P.
willing to abide by any stringent condition which may be imposed by
the Court.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the
counsel for the respondent/State. It is submitted that apart from the
present case, 10 more criminal cases were registered against the
applicant including one under Section 302 of IPC and apart from that,
on two occasions, the order under Sections 14 and 15 of M.P. Rajya
Suraksha Adhiniyam were also passed.
In reply, it is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that so
far as the offence under Section 302 of IPC is concerned, he has
already been acquitted on merits and he has also been acquitted in one
more offence which was registered under Section 194 of IPC.
Considering the period of detention and without commenting on
the merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is directed that the
applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum
of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) with one surety in the like
amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court to
appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.
It is further directed that the applicant shall appear before the
S.H.O. Police Station Shahar Basoda, District Vidisha on 1st of
every month during the pendency of the Trial.
In case of bail jump or non-appearance of the applicant before
the police station as directed by this Court, this order shall lose its
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.64086/2021 Golu @ Nitesh vs. State of M.P.
effect.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the
case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on
18.03.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation
regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.
Certified copy as per rules.
(G.S. Ahluwalia)
(alok) Judge
ALOK KUMAR
2022.01.06 17:03:58 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!