Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1629 MP
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2022
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC No.4610/2022
(Jagdish Vishwakarma Vs. State of M.P.)
Through video conferencing
Gwalior, Dated: 04.02.2022
Shri S.K. Dubey, Counsel for the applicant.
Shri R.K. Awasthi, Counsel for the State.
Case diary is available.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that yesterday
he has removed the default.
This first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been
filed for grant of bail.
The applicant has been arrested on 12.01.2022 in connection
with Crime No.07/2022 registered at Police Station Mayapur, Distt.
Shivpuri for offence under Section 34(2) of Excise Act.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that according
to the prosecution case, 60 bulk liters of country made liquor has
been seized from the possession of the applicant. The applicant is in
jail since 12.01.2022 and he is an innocent person and has been
falsely implicated. The Trial is likely to take sufficiently long time
and there is no possibility of his absconding or tampering with the
prosecution case.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the
counsel for the State. It is further submitted that the applicant has a
criminal history and one more offence under Section 34(2) of Excise
2
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC No.4610/2022
(Jagdish Vishwakarma Vs. State of M.P.)
Act was registered against him in the year 2012.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and
without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is
allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on
furnishing cash surety of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac) or in the
alternative on depositing his original title-deed(s) [not Rin Pustika]
of the immovable property worth of more than the said amount, as
directed by the Supreme Court in the case of Sharo @ Shahrukh Vs.
The State of MP by order dated 06.09.2021 passed in SLP (Cri)
No. 6321/2021 to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court
to appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of trial but in case
of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
It is made clear that single default in appearance before the
Trial Court, or in case of registration of new offence, this bail order
shall automatically come to an end and the cash surety so furnished
by the applicant shall automatically stand forfeited without any
reference to the Court. If, the title deeds are deposited, then the same
shall not be returned unless the cash surety amount is deposited.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in
the case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on
18.03.2021
in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.4610/2022 (Jagdish Vishwakarma Vs. State of M.P.)
regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.
CC as per rules.
(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge Shanu Digitally signed by SHANU RAIKWAR Date: 2022.02.04 15:11:41 -08'00'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!