Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6088 MP
Judgement Date : 27 September, 2021
1
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE
Cr. A. No.5662 of 2021
Anil and another Vs. State of M.P.
Indore, Dated:- 27/09/2021
Shri N. J. Dave, Counsel for the appellants - Anil and Sachin.
Shri A. S. Parihar, Counsel for the respondent/State.
Heard on IA No.26337/2021, first application under Section
389 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for suspension of
jail sentence and grant of bail filed on behalf of the appellants.
The present appellants have been convicted and sentenced by
Additional Sessions Judge, Bhikangaon, Mandleshwar, West Nimar
(MP) in Sessions Trial No.386/2013 vide judgment dated 14.09.2021,
as under: -
Conviction Sentence
Section Act RI Fine Imprisonment in
amount lieu of fine
325 IPC 6 months Rs.1,000/- 3 months RI
325/34 IPC 6 months Rs.1,000/- 3 months RI
Counsel for the appellants has submitted that after conviction,
the jail sentence of the appellants have already been suspended by the
trial Court upto 12.10.2021. It is further submitted that there are fair
chances of success in the appeal, there is no possibility of early
disposal of this appeal in near future; and if the sentence is not
suspended, then the present appeal filed by the appellants may turn
infructuous. Under these circumstances and looking to the short
sentence imposed on the appellants, counsel for the appellants prays
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE Cr. A. No.5662 of 2021 Anil and another Vs. State of M.P.
for suspension of jail sentence of the appellants and grant of bail to
them.
Counsel for the respondent / State of Madhya Pradesh opposes
the application by submitting that no sufficient ground is made out for
releasing the appellants on bail; hence the application filed by the
appellants be dismissed.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the
arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, this Court is of the
considered opinion that the application for suspension of custodial
sentence deserves to be allowed.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the
case, IA No.26337/2021 is allowed and it is directed that on
furnishing a personal bond by the appellants in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with separate solvent
sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial
Court, for their regular appearance before concerned trial Court, the
execution of the custodial part of the sentence imposed against the
appellants shall remain suspended, till the final disposal of this
appeal.
The appellants, after being enlarged on bail, shall mark their
presence before the concerned trial Court on 13.12.2021 and on all
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE Cr. A. No.5662 of 2021 Anil and another Vs. State of M.P.
such subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the concerned Court in this
regard.
Let the record of the case from the concerned trial Court be
requisitioned; and list the matter on the question of admission soon
thereafter.
C. c. as per rules.
(SUBODH ABHYANKAR) JUDGE Pankaj Digitally signed by PANKAJ PANDEY Date: 2021.09.27 17:07:37 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!