Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahendra Singh Dangi vs National Highway Authority Of ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 5537 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5537 MP
Judgement Date : 16 September, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Mahendra Singh Dangi vs National Highway Authority Of ... on 16 September, 2021
Author: Chief Justice
                                     1                           WP-17973-2021
            The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                       WP-17973-2021
  (MAHENDRA SINGH DANGI AND OTHERS Vs NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND
                                   OTHERS)



Jabalpur, Dated : 16-09-2021

         Heard through Video Conferencing.
         Shri R.B. Patel, learned counsel for the petitioners.
         Shri Priyanshu Khare, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri K. N.
Pethia, learned counsel for the respondents/National Highway Authority of

India.

This writ petition has been filed by five petitioners aggrieved by non- making of reference to the competent Civil Court in accordance with the provisions of Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956 as to the apportionment of the amount of compensation amongst the petitioners and the respondents No. 3 to 5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that while on one hand the competent authority has not decided the application (Annexure-P/15) filed by the petitioners before him on 7.4.2021 and on the other hand, the petitioners apprehend that the amount of the compensation may be disbursed

to the respondents No. 3 to 5. The prayer is therefore made that the competent authority i.e. respondent No.2 be directed to make a reference under Section Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956 to the appropriate Civil Court and pending decision on such reference, the amount of compensation may not be disbursed to any party. Learned counsel for the petitioners in support of his arguments has relied upon the judgments of this Court in Kanhaiyalal Patel and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors., [2008 (3) MPLJ 48] and in Ramswaroop and Ors. Vs. National Highway Authority of India, Narsinghpur and Ors, [2016 (2) MPLJ 224].

Section 3H(1) of the National Highways Act, 1956 provides that the amount determined under section 3G shall be deposited by the Central Government in such manner as may be laid down by rules made in this behalf 2 WP-17973-2021 by that Government, with the competent authority before taking possession of the land. It further provides that as soon as may be after the amount has been deposited under sub-section (1), the competent authority shall on behalf of the Central Government pay the amount to the person or persons entitled thereto. Sub-section (3) thereof provided where several persons claim to be

interested in the amount deposited under sub-section (1), the competent authority shall determine the persons who in its opinion are entitled to receive the amount payable to each of them. Such a decision in the present case has been taken by the competent authority on 16.3.2021. But the petitioners soon thereafter on 7.4.2021 filed an application in light of sub-section (4) of Section 3H of the National Highways Act, 1956 which stipulates that if any dispute arises as to the apportionment of the amount or any part thereof or to any person to whom the same or any part thereof is payable, the competent authority shall refer the dispute to the decision of the principal civil court of original jurisdiction within the limits of whose jurisdiction the land is situated. Once a dispute has arisen and an application has been made, there is no escape for the competent authority except to make the reference of the dispute to the decision of the principal civil Court of original jurisdiction as the language of sub-section (4) of Section 3H of the National Highways Act, 1956 has mandated that the "competent authority shall refer the dispute".

This writ petition is therefore disposed of with direction to the competent authority to make an appropriate order on the application of the petitioners for making reference after hearing both the parties within a period of 30 days from the date of production of copy of this order before him. Till decision of such application, disbursement of the compensation to any party shall remain stayed.

With the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of.

          (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)                                (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)
              CHIEF JUSTICE                                        JUDGE
SKM
Digitally signed by SANTOSH
MASSEY
Date: 2021.09.17 16:36:28
+05'30'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter