Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6927 MP
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2021
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC-52690-2021
Munendra Singh Vs. State of M.P.
Gwalior, Dated : 27/10/2021
Smt. Uma Kushwah, Counsel for applicant.
Smt. Padamshri Agrawal, Counsel for State.
Case diary is available.
This is second application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for
grant of bail. The first bail application was dismissed by order dated
07.09.2021 passed in M.Cr.C. No.42649/2021 as withdrawn with liberty
to revive the prayer after filing of charge-sheet.
The applicant has been arrested on 17.06.2021 in connection with
Crime No.110/2021 registered by Police Station Chinor, District Gwalior
for offence punishable under Sections 392 of IPC and Section 11/13 of
MPDVPK Act.
It is submitted by Counsel for the applicant that although some of
the looted property seized from the possession of applicant has been
identified by the complainant as well as the applicant has also been
identified by the complainant but applicant is in jail for last more than
four months. The previous bail application was withdrawn with liberty to
revive the prayer after filing of charge-sheet. The Police after completing
the investigation has filed the charge-sheet. The applicant has no
criminal history and there is no possibility of his absconding or
tampering with prosecution case.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by Counsel for
the respondent/State. It is submitted that according to the prosecution
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC-52690-2021 Munendra Singh Vs. State of M.P.
case, the applicant along-with co-accused persons have robbed the
complainant and his wife and three silver ornaments belonging to the
complainant and one 315 bore country made pistol have been seized. It is
further submitted that not only seized articles have been identified by the
complainant but applicant has also been identified by the complainant.
However, It is fairly conceded that as per the case diary, there is nothing
to indicate that applicant has criminal history.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without
commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is
directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal
bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs.One Lac Only) with one surety in
the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court to
appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of the trial but in case
of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the
case of Aparna Bhat & Ors. vs. State of M.P. passed on 18/3/2021 in
Criminal Appeal No.329/2021, the intimation regarding grant of bail be
sent to the complainant.
Certified copy as per rule.
(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge Aman AMAN TIWARI 2021.10.27 17:25:16 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!