Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1106 MP
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2021
1 CRA-2474-2020
The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
CRA-2474-2020
(DEEPU @ DEEPCHANDRA KUSHWAHA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS)
5
Jabalpur, Dated : 26-03-2021
Shri Ravi Shankar Patel, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Nishant Yadav, learned P.L. for the respondent/State.
Shri Vikas Jyotishi, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. Record of the Court below is available.
Heard on the question of admission.
Appeal is admitted for final hearing.
Heard on I.A. No.5043/2020, an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the appellant-Deepu @ Deepchandra Kushwaha.
The appeal has been preferred under Section 14-A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Attrocities) Act by the appellant/accused against judgment dated 03.03.2020 passed by learned Special Judge, (Atrocities) Tikamgarh, (MP) in Special Case No.36/2018, by which the appellant has been convicted for offence under Sections 7/8 of POCSO Act and has been sentenced to
undergo R.I. for 3 years with fine of Rs.3,000/- and Section 3(1)(b)(i) of SC/ST Act and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 2 years with fine of Rs. 2,000/-. Default stipulations have also been imposed by the trial Court.
Prosecution case, in short, is that on 13.02.2020, at about 12:00 pm, appellant/accused caught the prosecutrix, aged about 16 years and pressed her breast. She cried then appellant/accused abused filthy language and threatened her. Thereafter he ran away.
L e a r n e d counsel for the appellant/accused submits that appellant/accused has been falsely implicated in this case. There is material contradictions and omissions in the evidence of witnesses. Learned trial Court already suspended the execution of sentence and grant bail to the
Signature Not appellant till 02.04.2020. Thereafter this Court has granted temporary bail to SAN Verified
Digitally signed by LALIT SINGH RANA Date: 2021.03.26 17:26:25 IST 2 CRA-2474-2020 the appellant till 20.04.2020. Thereafter due to COVID-19, case can not be listed then appellant/accused surrounded before the trial Court on 25.02.2021. Therefore appellant/accused is in custody since 25.02.2021 till now. During trial, accused-appellant remained in custody for some period. This appeal is of the year 2020. There are fair chances to succeed in the appeal. Final hearing of this appeal will take time. Therefore, the application
filed on behalf of the appellant may be allowed and the period of his remaining jail sentence may be suspended further and he may be released on bail.
Learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State has opposed the application.
Learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 has no objection. If execution of sentence of appellant/accused is suspended and he released on bail.
Considering the argument of both the parties and this fact that learned trial Court already suspended the execution of sentence and grant bail to the appellant till 02.04.2020. Thereafter this Court has granted temporary bail to the appellant till 20.04.2020. Therefore appellant/accused is in custody since 25.02.2021 till now. During trial, accused-appellant remained in custody for some period. This appeal is of the year 2020 and final hearing of this appeal will take time, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the considered opinion that it would be appropriate to suspend the execution of jail sentence awarded to the appellant and grant bail to him.
Consequently, I.A. No.5043/2020 is allowed subject to deposit of fine amount, if not already deposited. The custodial sentence awarded to the appellant shall remain suspended during the pendency of this appeal.
Appellant-Deepu @ Deepchandra Kushwaha be released from custody subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only), with one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The appellant shall appear and mark his Signature SAN Not Verified
Digitally signed by LALIT SINGH RANA Date: 2021.03.26 17:26:25 IST 3 CRA-2474-2020 presence before the trial Court on 16.06.2021 and shall continue to do so on all such future dates, as may be given by the trial Court in this behalf, during pendency of the matter.
I n view of the outbreak of 'Corona Virus disease (COVID-19)' the appellant shall also comply with the rules and norms of social distancing. Further, in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in suo moto W.P.No.1/2020, it would be appropriate to issue the following direction to the jail authority :-
1. The Jail Authority shall ensure the medical examination of the appellant by the jail doctor before his release.
2 . The appellant shall not be released if he is suffering from 'Corona
Virus disease'. For this purpose appropriate tests will be carried out.
3 . If it is found that the appellant is suffering from 'Corona Virus disease', necessary steps will be taken by the concerned authority by placing him in appropriate quarantine facility.
List the matter for final hearing in due course. C.C. as per rules.
(RAJENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA) JUDGE
L.R.
Signature SAN Not Verified Digitally signed by LALIT SINGH RANA Date: 2021.03.26 17:26:25 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!