Babulal Parmar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 2679 MP

-1-                                              W.P No.5291/21

              HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH,
                         BENCH AT INDORE
                          W.P NO.5291/2021
      Babulal Parmar & Puralal Malviya vs.State of M.P & others
24.06.2021: (INDORE):
       Shri Rakesh Pal, learned counsel for the petitioners.
       Shri Prateek Patwardhan, learned Panel Advocate for the
respondent/State.

The petitioner before this Court has filed this present petition claiming benefit of second Kramonnati by virtue of executive instructions issued by State Government dated 21.03.1983 and 19.04.1999.

The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that his case is squarely covered by judgment delivered in W.P. No.6773 of 2006 (s) in the case of Smt. Prerna Khoranne Vs. State of M.P. and others passed on 26.04.2007.

Learned PL has fairly stated before this Court that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment delivered in the case of Smt. Prerna Khoranne (supra), wherein in identical circumstances the teachers of Education Department or Tribal Welfare Department were held entitled to receive the benefits of second Kramonnati under the policy dated 21.03.1983 and 19.04.1999 and 02.11.2001.

Resultantly, keeping in view the judgment delivered in the case of Smt. Prerna Khoranne (supra) with the consent of the parties the present writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

(i) Clause-3 of policy dated 3.9.2005 fixing the cut of date1.8.2003 to grant the benefit of second kramonnati to the teachers is arbitrary, discriminatory, hence quashed.

(ii) Teachers of Education Department or Tribal Welfare Department are held entitled to get the benefit of Kramonnati under the policy dated 21.3.83, 19.4.99 and 2.11.2001 in accordance with the terms and conditions as specified therein.

-2- W.P No.5291/21

(iii) The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners keeping in view executive instructions dated 21.03.83, 19.04.1999 and 02.11.2001 and settle his claim within the period of six months from today and the arrears thereof be also released within the aforesaid period. With the aforesaid directions, the petition is disposed of. Certified copy as per rules.

(VIVEK RUSIA) JUDGE Digitally signed by HARI KUMAR C G NAIR hk/ Date: 2021.06.24 18:02:42 +05'30'