Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr Tripti Singh W/O Shri Mejor ... vs Aditya Singh Sengar
2021 Latest Caselaw 2241 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2241 MP
Judgement Date : 10 June, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Dr Tripti Singh W/O Shri Mejor ... vs Aditya Singh Sengar on 10 June, 2021
Author: Vishal Mishra
                            1
               HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                           MCRC-4723-2021
  (DR TRIPTI SINGH W/O SHRI MEJOR ADITYA SINGH SENGAR Vs ADITYA SINGH SENGAR)



Gwalior, Dated : 10.06.2021

      Heard through video conferencing.

      Shri Prem Singh Bhadoriya, learned counsel for the petitioner.

      Shri A.S. Bhadoriya, learned counsel for the respondent.

With consent, heard finally.

Heard on I.A. No. 17433/2021, an application for amendment in

the present petition.

For the reasons mentioned therein, accordingly, the same is

hereby allowed.

Let necessary amendment be carried out during course of day.

This petition has been filed under Section 24 of the Code of

Civil Procedure by wife/petitioner for transfer of Case No. 927-A/2020

(HMA) pending in the Court of Principal Judge, Gwalior, (M.P.) to the

Family Court, Bhopal (M.P.)

The contention of the petitioner is that she is a legally married

wife of the respondent. It is submitted that a matrimonial dispute arose

between the parties with effect from 23/03/2019 and the petitioner is

living with her parents at Bhopal. She has also lodged the complaint in

the Women's Police Station, Bhopal for offences punishable under

Sections 498-A, 406, 506 and 34 of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry

Prohibition Act, in which the respondent has already been bailed out in

the matter and the matter is pending before the JMFC, Bhopal.

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC-4723-2021 (DR TRIPTI SINGH W/O SHRI MEJOR ADITYA SINGH SENGAR Vs ADITYA SINGH SENGAR)

Secondly, an application under Section 12 of Protection of Women

from Domestic Violence Act, which is also pending before the court of

JMFC, Bhopal and the respondent was giving his appearance before

the Court of Bhopal as and when the trial was fixed the date. It is

submitted that she is working as Doctor at Government Hospital and

she is continuing taken care of patients during second phase of

COVID-19. The respondent has filed an application under Section

13(ka) of the Hindu Marriage Act before the Principal Judge, Gwalior

which is pending. The reason/ ground assigned by the petitioner for

transfer of the case is that the distance from Bhopal to Gwalior is about

450 Kms and she is unable to attend the dates fixed by the court for

hearing regularly due to her work of nature which is causing great

hardship to her. In these circumstances, this petition has been filed. He

has relied upon the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court

in the case of Sumita Singh Vs. Sanjay Singh and another reported

in 2001 (10) SCC 41, whereby the Hon'ble Supreme court has held that

in matrimonial cases the convenience of the wife would be a

paramount consideration and application filed by the wife for transfer

of case should be dealt with liberally and convenience of wife must be

looked into by the Court while exercising power to transfer the case

under Section 24 of the Court. Therefore, she prays for allowing the

petition and Case No. 927-A/2020 (HMA) pending before learned

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC-4723-2021 (DR TRIPTI SINGH W/O SHRI MEJOR ADITYA SINGH SENGAR Vs ADITYA SINGH SENGAR)

Family Court, Gwalior may be transferred to Principal Judge, Bhopal.

The learned counsel for the respondent has refuted the

contention of the petitioner and submits that no case of transfer is made

out. He further submits that the petitioner is highly educated and

serving in Government Hospital as a Doctor and is in a position to

come at Gwalior to attend the hearing of the case. Even otherwise,

Gwalior is not far away from Bhopal. The respondent is ready to pay

reasonable conveyance charges to the petitioner alongwith one

attendant. Therefore no case is made out for transfer of the case from

the court at Gwalior to Family Court, Bhopal (M.P.).

Heard learned counsel for parties and perused the documents.

The question which arose for consideration in this petition is

whether on the ground of convenience of the wife/petitioner and in the

facts and circumstances of the case, same can be transferred from the

Court at Gwalior to Family Court, Bhopal ?

It is seen from the record that an application under Section

13(ka) of Hindu Marriage Act for divorce has been filed by the

husband/respondent at Family Court Gwalior, whereas, wife is residing

at Bhopal, which is about 450 KM from Gwalior. She has shown her

personal inconvenience because of her job nature, whereas, husband

being Government servant and he can very well travel up at Bhopal for

attending the Court's proceedings. It is further argued that husband is

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC-4723-2021 (DR TRIPTI SINGH W/O SHRI MEJOR ADITYA SINGH SENGAR Vs ADITYA SINGH SENGAR)

attending the proceeding under Section 12 of Protection of Women

from Domestic Violence Act as well as proceedings under Section 498-

A of IPC which are pending before J.M.FC, Bhopal, therefore, he can

very well attend the proceedings of the case filed by him under Section

13 (ka) of Hindu Marriage Act. Even otherwise, application under

Section 13(ka) of Hindu Marriage Act, has been filed by the husband,

but as per the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case

of Sunita Singh (Supra), wherein in similar circumstance, the Hon'ble

Court after considering the convenience of wife, has allowed the

application for transfer of case.

Considering the aforesaid aspect of the case, the petition is

allowed and the Case No. 927-A/2020 pending before Family Court,

Gwalior is directed to be transferred to Principal Judge, Bhopal in the

interest of justice. Parties are directed to make their presence at

Principal Judge, Bhopal on 05.07.2021, in Case No.927-A/2020

(HMA) and on subsequent dates as may be fixed by the Family Court.

With the aforesaid observations, the petition is hereby allowed.

                                                    (Vishal Mishra)
LJ*/-                                                   Judge

                 LOKENDRA JAIN
                 2021.06.14
                 15:51:32 -07'00'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter