Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3424 MP
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2021
1 M.Cr.C.No.51599 of 2020
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR
Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Rajeev Kumar Dubey, J.
Misc. Criminal Case No.51599/2020
Smt. Girja Devi Tiwari & Others
Vs.
State of M.P. & Anr.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Prashant Singh, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Rakesh Kumar
Shukla, counsel for the applicant.
Shri Rajeshwar Rao, learned GA for the respondent/EOW.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORDER
Reserved on : 15.07.2020 Delivered on : 19.07.2021
This is the first application filed by applicants under Section 438 of
Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail. The applicants Smt. Girja Devi Tiwari
and Smt. Preeti Tiwari apprehends their arrest in connection with Crime
No.20/2018, registered at P.S. Economic Offence Wing, Distt. Jabalpur (MP)
for the offence punishable under Section 120-B of IPC and Sections 13(1)
(E), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act.
2. As per the prosecution case, complainant Ram Naresh Sharma lodged
a written complaint before I.G. Economic Offences Head Quarter, Bhopal
averring that co-accused Kodu Prasad Tiwari, who had retired from the post
of Superintendent Engineer, Water Resources Department, Seoni w hile Signature Not Verified SAN posted and functioning as public servant committed corruption and Digitally signed by MANOJ NAIR Date: 2021.07.20 17:30:24 IST
procured unaccounted property. Officials of, Economic Offences Wing,
Jabalpur inquired the complaint and collected the information regarding the
properties procured by the co-accused Kodu Prasad Tiwari and found that
co-accused Kodu Prasad Tiwari was posted in M.P. Water Resources
Department from 05/02/1980 to 31/12/2011 and during the check period
01/01/2005 to 01/12/2011 his total income from salary was Rs.30,95,697/-
and before the check period his total income from salary was Rs.20,90,607/-
and income from agriculture was Rs.4,20,200/- and Out of that amount,
when 55% are deducted as the amount spent by him on himself and his
family, his savings should be around Rs. 29,62,897/-, while during the check
period co-accused Kodu Prasad had invested a sum of Rs.2,25,56,679/- in
purchasing immovable properties. On that Economic Offences Wing,
Jabalpur registered Crime No.20/2018, for the offence punishable under
Section 120-B of IPC and Section 13(1)(E), 13(2) of Prevention of
Corruption Act against the applicants and co-accused Kodu Prasad Tiwari
and Rakesh Tiwari and investigated the matter. During the investigation,
officials of, Economic Offences Wing, Jabalpur also searched the residence
of co-accused Kodu Prasad Tiwari located at Jabalpur and Satna and the
bank lockers owned by him in his name and the name of his family members
and also collected the information regarding his bank balance and other
investment and found that co-accused Kodu Prasad Tiwari had purchased
land worth of Rs. 5,56,79,707/- in the name of her wife, applicant Smt Girja
Devi and other family members and Rs. 1,50,84,826/- have been deposited
into the bank accounts of his family members and invested in Insurence
policies. An amount of around Rs.230000/- lakhs cash was recovered from
his houses and petrol pump owned by him in the name of his wife applicant
no.1 Smt. Girja Devi. more than 3 kg Gold in the form of gold biscuits and
jewellery and silver coins and jewellery worth around Rs. 88 Lakhs have Signature Not Verified SAN
also been recovered from his houses and bank lockers. Four Cars, one Digitally signed by MANOJ NAIR Date: 2021.07.20 17:30:24 IST
tractor, one tanker worth Rs.46,10,000/- were also seized from his houses
located at Jabalpur and Satna. Co-accused Kodu Prasad Tiwari during the
period from 01/01/2005 to 01/12/2011 while he was posted in the M.P.
Water Resource Department in the capacity of public servant intentionally
enriched himself illicitly by way of amassing pecuniary resources and
procured property worth more than Rs.7 crores in his name and in the name
of his family members, which are disproportionate to his known sources of
income to which he cannot satisfactorily account for and applicants are also
involved in the crime.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are
innocent and have falsely been implicated in the crime. It is further
submitted that earlier also the officials of Economic Offence Wing had
registered crime no.03/1998 for the offence punishable under Section 13(1)
(E) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act against the co-accused Kodu
Prasad Tiwari, but later on they had filed closure report in the crime and
thereafter again malafidely registered this case 7 years after his retirement
from service. Co-accused Kodu Prasad also has agriculture land and other
property, from which he had income. He had given the information to his
department at the time of purchase of each property as per rules. Applicant
No.1 has income from agriculture land and petrol pumps etc. She has
regularly filed her income tax return in which she showed her income.
Applicant no.2 also teaches students and also runs a beauty parlour from
which she has income and she also files income tax return every year, in
which she shows her income. Officials of EOW falsely registered the case of
disproportionate property against the applicants. The applicants are ladies
and they are ready to cooperate in the trial. Under these circumstances,
learned counsel for the applicants prays for grant of anticipatory bail. In this
regard learned counsel of the applicants also placed reliance upon the Signature Not Verified SAN
judgment of this court passed in the case of Rajesh Chutani vs Union of Digitally signed by MANOJ NAIR Date: 2021.07.20 17:30:24 IST
India (MCRC No. 4623/2020) and judgments of coordinate benches of this
court passed in the cases of Smt. Anuradha Upadhyay Vs State of MP
passed in (MCRC 42914/2020 dated 23/ 11/ 2020), Suresh Upadhyay Vs
State of MP passed in (MCRC No. 48343 /2020 dated 10/12/2020) and
Pushpendra Singh Vs Union of India passed in (MCRC 6644/ 2020 dated
07/07/ 2020).
4. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submitted that
during investigation of the Crime No.03/1998 earlier registered against the
co-accused Kodu Prasad, he took the plea that some of the agriculture land
belonged to his father due to which officials of EOW had filed closure report
in the crime but after the filing the closure report in the earlier crime by the
officials of EOW, Kodu Prasad filed a civil suit against his father, for
declaring him owner of that land which shows that co-accused Kodu Prasad,
got a closure report in that crime by giving false information. During the
total tenure of the service from 05/02/1980 to 31/12/2011 co-accused Kodu
Prasad's total income from salary was around Rs.57 lakhs and income from
agriculture was Rs.4,20,200/- while he owned movable and immovable
property worth of Rs, 7 crore. Many of the properties that co-accused Kodu
Prasad acquired during the period of his service are in the name of applicant
No.1, including petrol pumps, agricultural land etc. Officials of EOW also
seized huge amounts of cash and jewellery from her possession. Officials of
EOW also found that co-accused Kodu Prasad had acquired the agricultural
land in the name of applicant no.2 who is the daughter in law of co-accused
Kodu Prasad. Officials of EOW also found an unaccounted cash amount in
her bank account and some jewellery in her possession which shows the
involvement of applicant nos.1 & 2 in the said crime with Kodu Prasad. He
further submitted that the documents filed by the applicant no.1 regarding
selling of agriculture produce were also found forged. Investigation of the Signature Not Verified SAN
crime is on, so applicants should not be released on anticipatory bail. Digitally signed by MANOJ NAIR Date: 2021.07.20 17:30:24 IST
5. In the above-mentioned bail orders, this court and other Coordinate
Benches of this Court have not laid down any guideline regarding granting
anticipatory bail. In fact, the respective Courts have granted bail to the
accused persons considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of those
cases. So, on the basis of those orders, the applicants are not entitled to get
anticipatory bail in this case on the basis of parity.
6. On the other hand from the judgment of the Apex Court passed in the
case of Nimmagadda Prasad Vs C.B.I. reported in (2013) 7 SCC 466, it is
clear that the economic offences are considered grave offences as it affects
the economy of the country as a whole and such offences having deep-
rooted conspiracy and involving huge loss of public funds are to be viewed
seriously. The economic offence is committed with cool calculation and
deliberate design solely with an eye on personal profit regardless of the
consequence to the community. In such types of offences, while granting
bail, the Court has to keep in mind, inter alia, the larger interest of the public
and State. The nature and seriousness of an economic offence and its impact
on society are always important considerations in such a case.
7. It is alleged that co-accused Kodu Prasad Tiwari had purchased land
worth of Rs. 5,56,79,707/- in his name and the name of his wife, applicant
no.1 Smt Girja Devi, his daughter in law applicant no.2 Smt. Preeti Tiwari
and other family members and Rs. 1,50,84,826/- have been found deposited
into the bank accounts of applicants and other family members of co-
accused Kodu Prasad including applicants and invested in Insurance
policies. An amount around Rs.2,30,000/- lakhs cash was recovered from his
houses and one petrol pump owned by him in the name of his wife applicant
no.1 Smt. Girja Devi, more than 3 kg Gold in the form of jewellery and gold
biscuits and silver coins and jewellery worth around Rs. 88 Lakhs has also
been recovered from his houses and bank lockers. Four Cars, one tractor, Signature Not Verified SAN
one tanker worth Rs.46,10,000/- were also seized from his houses located at Digitally signed by MANOJ NAIR Date: 2021.07.20 17:30:24 IST
Jabalpur and Satna. Co-accused Kodu Prasad Tiwari had procured property
worth more than Rs.7 crore in his name and in the name of his family
members including applicants, which are disproportionate to his known
sources of income to which he cannot satisfactorily account for and
applicants are also involved in the crime. In this regard, investigation is
going on, so looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the
gravity of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to
the applicants.
Hence, the application is dismissed.
(Rajeev Kumar Dubey) Judge
mn
Signature Not Verified SAN
Digitally signed by MANOJ NAIR Date: 2021.07.20 17:30:24 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!