Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mamta Jatav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr
2021 Latest Caselaw 303 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 303 MP
Judgement Date : 27 February, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Mamta Jatav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr on 27 February, 2021
Author: Sheel Nagu
                                       1
            The High Court of Madhya Pradesh
                                                        Cr.A.No.726/2017

                        Mamta Vs. State of M.P.
Gwalior dated 27.02.2021

      Shri Raghuvir Singh and Shri Manas Dubey, learned counsel for

the appellant.

      Shri R.P. Singh, learned Public Prosecutor for respondent/State.

Per Justice Pathak J:

IA.No.21129/2020 first application u/Sec. 389(1) Cr.P.C. for

suspension of sentence and grant of bail moved on behalf of appellant

-Mamta is taken up and considered.

This criminal appeal assails the judgment dated 28-04-2017

passed in ST.No.218/2015 by the First Additional Sessions Judge,

Morena (M.P.) whereby appellant has been convicted and sentenced as

under with default stipulation :-

         Sections            Imprisonment                 Fine
302/34                   Life Imprisonment       Rs.1,00,000/- with
                                                 default stipulation

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the trial

Court erred in convicting the appellant and awarding jail sentence. It

is further submitted that co-accused Pappu has been acquitted by the

trial Court on same set of facts and only distinction is that he deposed

himself before the trial Court as defence witness and therefore, he

was acquitted by the trial Court and convicted the present appellant.

Learned counsel for the appellant referred discussion surfaced in the

judgment of trial Court and different paras to submit that eye-witness

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh Cr.A.No.726/2017

account of Smt. Saroj (PW-1) and her husband Virendra (PW-2) are

bit tentative and shaky, still the trial Court convicted the appellant

whereas prosecution did not prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.

She also suffered more than 6 years of incarceration. Thus, prayed for

grant of bail.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the application and

prayed for its rejection by contending that on the basis of the

allegations and the material available on record, no case for

suspension of sentence is made out.

Considering the above submissions and that there is no

likelihood of early disposal of the present appeal in the near future due

to ongoing Covid-19 pandemic crises and looking to the period of

custody, without entering into the merits of the matter, this Court is

inclined to grant bail to appellant by way of suspension of sentence.

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits,

IA.No.21129/2020 is allowed and it is directed that the jail sentence of

appellant will remain under suspension subject to verification that the

amount of fine has been deposited, on appellant furnishing bail bond

of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent

surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of concerned Trial Court

for her appearance before the concerned Trial Court on 05.05.2021

and on such further dates as may be fixed by him which shall be of

frequency not less than once a year.

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh Cr.A.No.726/2017

In case, appellant is found absent on any date fixed by the

concerned Trial Court then the said Trial Court shall be free to issue

and execute warrant of arrest for securing her presence without first

referring the matter to this Court, provided the Registry of this Court

is kept informed.

The learned concerned Trial Court and the prosecution are

directed to ensure following of Covid-19 precautionary protocol

prescribed from time to time by the Supreme Court, the Central Govt.

and as well as the State Govt. during release, travel and residence of

the appellant during period of suspension of sentence as a

consequence of this order.

The appellant as a Shiksha Swayamsewak shall render physical

and financial assistance to Govt. Primary School situated nearest to

her residence for ensuring hygiene and sanitation and for removing

deficiencies of infrastructural amenities in the said School from the

skill /resources of appellant. (vihykFkhZ ,d f'k{kk Lo;aLksod ds :i esa vius

fuokl ds fudV vofLFkr ljdkjh izkFkfed fo|ky; esa LoPNrk vkSj vkjksX; dks

lqfuf'pr djus ds fy, 'kkjhfjd ,oa foRrh; lgk;rk iznku djsxk rFkk vius dkS'ky o

lalk/kuksa ls mDr fo|ky; esa volajpukRed lqfo/kkvksa dh dfe;ksa dks nwj djsxhA).

The appellant after selecting a particular Govt. Primary School

shall inform about the same to the office of Gram Panchayat (in case

of rural area) and/or Ward Officer of the concerned ward (in case of

urban area), within whose territorial jurisdiction the said school is

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh Cr.A.No.726/2017

situated. (vihykFkhZ ,d fof'k"V izkFkfed ljdkjh Ldwy dk p;u djus ds i'pkr~

blds ckjs esa xzke iapk;r ds dk;kZy; ¼xzkeh.k {ks= ds ekeys esa½ [email protected];k lEcaf/kr okMZ

ds okMZ vf/kdkjh ¼'kgjh {ks= ds ekeys es½a ftlds {ks=kf/kdkj esa mDr Ldwy vofLFkr gS]

dks lwfpr djsxhA).

It will be joint responsibility of Sarpanch and Secretary of said

Gram Panchayat (in case of rural area) and/or Ward Officer of the

concerned ward (in case of urban area) to preserve the said

information provided by the appellant. (;g] lEcaf/kr okMZ ds okMZ vf/kdkjh

¼'kgjh {ks= ds ekeys es½a [email protected];k mDr xzke iapk;r ds ljiap vkSj lfpo ¼xzkeh.k {ks=

ds ekeys esa½ dh la;qDr ftEesnkjh gksxh fd] vihykFkhZ }kjk iznRr lwpuk dks lajf{kr

djssaA).

The Registry of this court shall communicate this order through

Legal Aid Officer, SALSA, Gwalior to the Collector, District

Education Officer, Block Education Officer of the district/block

concerned for information and compliance.

A copy of this order be supplied to the Legal Aid Officer,

SALSA, Gwalior who is directed to communicate this order to the

District Education Officer, Block Education Officer of the

district/block concerned to verify as to whether appellant has

complied with abovementioned condition or not and submit report

once every month.

In case report regarding abovementioned condition is not filed

or report is found to be wanting in any manner then Registry is

directed to list this matter as PUD before appropriate Bench.

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh Cr.A.No.726/2017

A copy of this order be sent to the Trial Court of the concerned

district for compliance.

C.c. as per rules.

                                          (Sheel Nagu)                           (Anand Pathak)
                                             Judge                                   Judge
   Anil*

ANIL       Digitally signed by ANIL KUMAR
           CHAURASIYA


KUMAR
           DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA
           PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, ou=HIGH
           COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH
           GWALIOR, postalCode=474001,

CHAURASI   st=Madhya Pradesh,
           2.5.4.20=8512f40a1a9eaa50b6802d068
           b51dae27e84c266b09d283f0799e67cdc


YA
           7df50f, cn=ANIL KUMAR CHAURASIYA
           Date: 2021.03.02 12:44:59 -08'00'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter