Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8691 MP
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2021
1
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR MADHYA PRADESH,
AT JABALPUR
(DIVISION BENCH)
W.A.No.1380 /2018
Dashrath Prasad Jhariya Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh and others ...Respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram :
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath, Chief Justice.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla, Judge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence :
Shri P.Pareek, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri A.A.Bernad, Deputy Advocate General for the
respondents/State.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
(13/12/2021) Per : V.K. Shukla, J.
The present intra court appeal has been filed under Section 2(1) of
Madhya Pradesh Uccha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal)
Adhiniyam, 2005, being aggrieved by the order dated 01-08-2018 passed
in W.P. No.13864/2013, whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed
the writ petition filed by the appellant.
2. The appellant challenged the order dated 12-11-2012 passed by the
respondent no.2/Additional Commissioner, Jabalpur, whereby his appeal
filed against the order dated 12-09-2005 passed by the Collector, Katni
has been dismissed.
3. The appellant was working as Panchayat Karmi and was conferred
with the powers of Panchayat Secretary. By the impugned order
12-09-2005, he was de-notified as Secretary on the allegation of
defalcation and misappropriation of public money against him. The
appellant did not challenge the order of de-notification and confined the
challenge to only recovery which was issued by order dated 21-05-2007
by the Janpad Panchayat.
4. The appellant first time challenged the order of de-notification in
the year 2011 in a writ petition which was dismissed as withdrawn with
liberty to file an appeal before the Commissioner.
5. The learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition on the
ground of delay. The appellant has failed to give any explanation for the
delay in challenging the order of de-notification dated 12-09-2005. In the
year 2011, the appeal was preferred after a period of 6 years and there
was no explanation to the delay. The learned Single Judge has taken
into consideration the facts of the case and held that there is no
explanation for 6 years in the appeal filed by the appellant. We do no
find any illegality or perversity in the order passed by the Learned Single
Judge warranting any interference in the intra court appeal. Accordingly,
the writ appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
(RAVI MALIMATH) (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)
CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE
hsp
Digitally signed by
HARSAHAI PATERIYA
Date: 2021.12.15
12:14:01 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!