Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kalyan Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 8046 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8046 MP
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Kalyan Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 December, 2021
Author: Atul Sreedharan
                                      1                                CRA-3104-2021
         The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                  CRA No. 2580 of 2021
              (MALKHAN SINGH AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
                              CRA No. 3104 of 2021
              (KALYAN SINGH AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)




Jabalpur, Dated : 01-12-2021
       Mr. Zafar Khan, learned counsel for the appellants in CRA NO. 2580/2021.
       Shri M.S. Rajpoot, learned counsel for the appellants in CRA No. 3104/2021
       Shri Manhar Dixit, learned Panel Lawyer for the State-respondent.

Heard on I.A.Nos. 6111/2021 and 8025/2021 , which are applications filed

under sections 389(1) Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to appellants.

All appellants herein have been tried and convicted for the offences punishable under sections 341, 148 and 302/149 of IPC and sentenced to suffer SI for one month, RI for 2 years and RI for life and fine of Rs.500/-,1000/- and 5000/- , respectively, with default stipulation, as mentioned in the impugned judgment.

The case of the prosecution is that on the date of incident, the appellants herein are stated to have waylaid the deceased who was traveling on a motor cycle and one of the accused/appellant Amar Singh went behind the deceased and fired one single shot at him with the country made fire arm resulting in his death. Learned

counsel for the appellants submits after having led us through the evidence of PW-10 and PW-11 that there was pre-existing enmity between the family of the deceased and that of the appellants herein. He further states that the postmortem report reflects only a single injury which was a gun shot injury resulting in the death of the deceased and further states that the postmortem report does not reveal any other injury besides that singular gun shot injury.

Learned counsel for the State on the other hand while opposing the application for suspension has submitted that PW-10 and PW-11 have categorically stated that all the appellants herein have waylaid the deceased blocked his path and thereafter facilitating Amar Singh to fire the fatal shot. He further says that there is no previous enmity which has been stated by the witnesses.

Per contra, learned counsel for the appellants has drawn our attention to the statement of PW-10 with specific reference to paragraph No. 5 in which the previous enmity between the appellants and the deceased side is available. However, learned 2 CRA-3104-2021 counsel for the appellants further submits that Amar Singh may be the sole accused in this case and the others have all been roped in on account of their interrelation to Amar Singh.

Be that as it may, looking at the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that besides the fatal gun shot there is no other internal or external injury on the body of the deceased, primafacie, reflection of previous ill will existing between

both the families and without commenting on the merits of the case, the applications are allowed and it is directed that the appellants shall be enlarged on bail upon their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand Only)each with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

Accordingly, IA No. 8026/2021, which is an application for urgent hearing during summer vacation, also stands disposed of.

The jail authorities shall have the appellants checked by the jail doctor to ensure that they are not suffering from the Novel Corona Virus (COVID-19) and if they are, they shall be sent to the nearest hospital designated by the state for treatment. If not, they shall be transported to their place of residence by the jail authorities.

Certified copy as per rules.

(ATUL SREEDHARAN) (SUNITA YADAV) JUDGE JUDGE

VD

VARSHA Digitally signed by VARSHA DUBEY DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, ou=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, postalCode=482001, st=Madhya Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=e360c7a2bb9378e314ecfcdf4458cd1c3a 3f9460d19cc958750389a65845567e,

DUBEY pseudonym=91BA72F7534E9399BED7C4DFF6D5 CF67F47B7602, serialNumber=BB80E27F6CE10A91C2938536D8B E6957B3DCCC282DEF75B7770758CAEB705635, cn=VARSHA DUBEY Date: 2021.12.02 17:07:14 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter