Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4696 MP
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2021
1
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE
Cr. A. No.4838 of 2021
Makhan Vs. State of M.P.
Indore, Dated:- 25/08/2021
Ms. Sarika Gupta, Counsel for the appellant - Makhan S/o
Jairam Chouhan.
Shri Yashpal Rathore, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.
Heard on IA No.22556/2021, first application under Section
389 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for suspension of
jail sentence and grant of bail filed on behalf of the appellant.
The present appellant has been convicted and sentenced by
Special Judge, (POCSO) Act, Ujjain (MP) in Special Case
No.111/2020 vide judgment dated 13.08.2021, as under: -
Conviction Sentence
Section Act RI Fine Imprisonment in
amount lieu of fine
354 IPC 1 year Rs.1,000/- 2 months RI
7&8 POCSO 3 years Rs.1,000/- 2 months RI
Act, 2012
341 IPC 1 month SI
Counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant was
on bail during the trial and he does not misuse the liberty so granted
to him. After conviction, the jail sentence of the appellant has already
been suspended by the trial Court upto 12.10.2021. It is further
submitted that there are fair chances of success in the appeal, there is
no possibility of early disposal of this appeal in near future; and if the
sentence is not suspended, then the present appeal filed by the
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE Cr. A. No.4838 of 2021 Makhan Vs. State of M.P.
appellant may turn infructuous. Under these circumstances and
looking to the short sentence imposed on the appellant, counsel for
the appellant prays for suspension of jail sentence of the appellant and
grant of bail to him.
Counsel for the respondent / State of Madhya Pradesh opposes
the application by submitting that no sufficient ground is made out for
releasing the appellant on bail; hence the application filed by the
appellant be dismissed.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the
arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, this Court is of the
considered opinion that the application for suspension of custodial
sentence deserves to be allowed.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the
case, IA No.22556/2021 is allowed and it is directed that on
furnishing a personal bond by the appellant in the sum of Rs.50,000/-
(Rupees fifty thousand only) with a solvent surety in the like amount
to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, for his / her regular
appearance before concerned trial Court, the execution of the
custodial part of the sentence imposed against the appellant shall
remain suspended, till the final disposal of this appeal.
The appellant, after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE Cr. A. No.4838 of 2021 Makhan Vs. State of M.P.
presence before the concerned trial Court on 13.12.2021 and on all
such subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the concerned Court in this
regard.
Let the record of the case from the concerned trial Court be
requisitioned; and list the matter on the question of admission soon
thereafter.
C. c. as per rules.
(SUBODH ABHYANKAR) JUDGE Pankaj Digitally signed by PANKAJ PANDEY Date: 2021.08.25 16:45:53 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!