Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nate @ Babloo vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 4618 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4618 MP
Judgement Date : 24 August, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Nate @ Babloo vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 24 August, 2021
Author: Rajeev Kumar Dubey
                                                                     1                               CRA-2093-2008
                                          The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                                                     CRA-2093-2008
                                                    (NATE @ BABLOO Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)


                                  Jabalpur, Dated : 24-08-2021
                                        Heard through Video Conferencing.

                                        None for the appellant.
                                        None for the respondent / State.

I n the absence of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is considered on the basis of PUD dated 14/08/2021 received from Jail

Superintendent, Central Jail, Satna.

This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment dated 28/06/2008 passed by Sessions Judge, Satna in Sessions Trial No.225/2006, whereby the learned Sessions Judge has convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Sections 307 read with Section 34 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for 7 years with fine of Rs.1,000/- with default stipulation.

A s per the report, dated 14/08/2021 received from the Jail Superintendent, Central Jail, Satna present appellant Nate @ Babloo has

already suffered the entire jail sentence and he has been released from jail on 10/12/2010.

I n the aforesaid circumstances, no useful purpose will be served by entering into the merits of the case as the appellant has already been released after undergoing the entire jail sentence.

Therefore, the appeal has become infructuous and may be disposed of without entering into the merits of the case in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Daya Singh Lohariya Vs. State of Rajasthan, (2007)5 SCC 366 and by the Jharkhand High Court in the case of Sarula Munda Vs. State of Bihar, 2011(3) Cr.L.J. 3639.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

Signature Not Verified SAN A copy of this order be sent to the jail authorities as well as to the Digitally signed by ANURAG SONI Date: 2021.08.24 17:14:10 IST 2 CRA-2093-2008 concerned trial Court for information and necessary action.

(RAJEEV KUMAR DUBEY) JUDGE

as

Signature Not Verified SAN

Digitally signed by ANURAG SONI Date: 2021.08.24 17:14:10 IST

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter