Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bajrang Prathmik Sahkari ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 4535 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4535 MP
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Bajrang Prathmik Sahkari ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 August, 2021
Author: Vishal Dhagat
                                                         1                              WP-12165-2021
                              The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                                         WP-12165-2021
                      (BAJRANG PRATHMIK SAHKARI UPBHOKTA BHANDAR, MYDT, GHUWARA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA
                                                    PRADESH AND OTHERS)

                      4
                      Jabalpur, Dated : 23-08-2021
                             Heard through Video Conferencing.
                             Shri Anil Lala, learned counsel for the petitioner.
                             Shri V.S. Choudhary, learned PL for the respondents/State.

Petitioner has filed this petition challenging orer dated 28.01.2021 and

22.03.2021 contained in Annexure P/3 and P/5 respectively.

By impugned order 22.03.2021, Collector has dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner on the ground that necessary party i.e. the society which has been given the fair price shop after attachment, has not been impleaded as a party.

Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that impugned order is illegal and the society which is running the shop after attachment is not a necessary party. He relied on judgment passed by Apex Court reported in (2016) 2 SCC 779, Poonam vs State of U.P. and others.

Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State has gone through the judgment and has made submission that society, which is running the shop after attachment, is not a necessary party.

Heard the counsel for the parties.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, impugned order dated 22.03.2021 passed by Collector, Chhatarpur is set aside. Respondent No.2-Collector Chhatarpur is directed to consider the appeal filed by petitioner and also consider its application for stay. Application for stay, which is filed by the petitioner, shall be considered by the Collector within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of order passed today.

With aforesaid direction, writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed Signature Not SAN Verified off.

Digitally signed by VINOD KUMAR TIWARI Date: 2021.08.23 18:20:44 IST 2 WP-12165-2021 C.C. as per rules.

                                                     (VISHAL DHAGAT)
                                                          JUDGE


                      vkt




Signature
 SAN      Not
Verified

Digitally signed by
VINOD KUMAR
TIWARI
Date: 2021.08.23
18:20:44 IST
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter