Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sayyad Ashique Ali vs State Of M.P. Through Narmada ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 4327 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4327 MP
Judgement Date : 13 August, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Sayyad Ashique Ali vs State Of M.P. Through Narmada ... on 13 August, 2021
Author: Rohit Arya
                                                                           1                              WP-17898-2019
                                               The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                                                          WP-17898-2019
                                            ((((SAYYAD ASHIQUE ALI Vs STATE OF M.P. THROUGH NARMADA VALLEY DEVELOPMENT
                                                                             DEPARTMENT))))

                                                 WP/16810/2019, WP/16813/2019, WP/16819/2019, WP/17898/2019
                                    6
                                    Indore, Dated : 13-08-2021
                                              Shri R.M. Deshpandey, learned counsel for the petitioners.
                                              Shri Ranjeet Sen, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.

Heard through Video Conferencing.

This batch of writ petitions is filed taking exception to withdrawal of

increment in respect of Grade-II employees granted by virtue to their selection by Screening Committee under time bound pay scale as they hold eligibility for Grade-II. This action has been taken without notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that earlier controversy has been resolved in series of cases by the co-ordinate Bench and the judgment so rendered has been affirmed by the Division Bench in the batch of writ appeals decided by common order dated 19.10.2020. Hence, the issue is no res-integra.

Learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State though tried to impress upon this Court that the judgment so read upon requires reconsideration.

This Court is of the view that the arguments so advanced is more of desperation than of substance. Accordingly, these writ petitions are allowed relying upon the judgment dated 19.10.2020 passed by the Division Bench of this Court and the operative portion of the judgment of the Single Judge passed in WP No.20518/2018 (Ku. Sadhana Mittal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & ors) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the facts of the instant case.

Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.

                                                                                                      (ROHIT ARYA)
                                                                                                         JUDGE

Signature Not Verified
  SAN                               Vibha

Digitally signed by VIBHA PACHORI
Date: 2021.08.14 12:06:09 IST
                                     2   WP-17898-2019




Signature Not Verified
  SAN




Digitally signed by VIBHA PACHORI
Date: 2021.08.14 12:06:09 IST
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter